[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1787120142540529.jpg 📥︎ (19.37 KB, 563x689) ImgOps

 â„–3977155[Quote]

Anyone else feel disappointed when a shithole country is still a shithole, despite decades of time passed? Like stop being a shithole and improve actually.
>bro they're low IQ, what did you expect?
I know, I'm just a hopeful person and I prefer to see some development, instead of seeing stagnating niggerhells, where people constantly flee from, just to end up in Europe.

 â„–3977162[Quote]

give us examples or is it just africa entirely

 â„–3977166[Quote]

>>3977162
It's not all of Africa, since Botswana is technically developed, but yes. It's also India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Philippines, etc. It's actually way too many countries.

 â„–3977186[Quote]

File: G-HtyE6WAAA6aUx.jpg 📥︎ (328.33 KB, 1639x2048) ImgOps

Not really. If anything I enjoy it because it confirms my model of the world, like this graph.

 â„–3977188[Quote]

>>3977186
What does this graph show?

 â„–3977190[Quote]

>>3977166
Botswana only became successful (by African standards) because they found massive deposits of diamonds and ores and by some miracle they got a functioning government instead of a warlord who would take all the exports income for himself while leaving the common folk to eat mud cookies and fly burgers. It's basically the peak of African potential with all the right conditions, and as soon as one of those conditions fails they will revert back to anarchy and poverty.

 â„–3977194[Quote]

same

 â„–3977196[Quote]

all nations can become good or can become shitholes
prosperity isn't a all growing thing, it varies

 â„–3977207[Quote]

>>3977190
Every African country has rich natural resources, yet they always end up with dictators that take all of the wealth and leave niggers still poor. Botswana is definetly a weird exception, since they're a landlocked desert country with a tiny population of 2 million that should have also ended up as a shithole, yet they didn't. I know that diamonds made them rich, but they managed to handle it well to not end up in corruption. The only problem is that they still haven't diversified and I wonder how long they can sustain themselves this way. Meanwhile, their neighbours like Zimbabwe and Namibia aren't doing well.

 â„–3977208[Quote]

>>3977196
>all nations can become good
I highly doubt that.
The only way an African country can become even half as prosperous as the average EU country is if they get colonized by White people again.

 â„–3977213[Quote]

File: substack-789ca55c-094d-4e….jpeg 📥︎ (224.13 KB, 1280x1600) ImgOps

File: 8565f8c94b5d729159ea3c396b….jpg 📥︎ (68.42 KB, 500x600) ImgOps

>>3977188
Global convergence(or 'catch up') of the developing/third world compared to the first world. It used to be increasing but ever since '95-00s it has been on a drop as these countries fail to catch up as realities like iq and diminishing returns to foreign aid and industrialization reveal themselves whe pushed to their limit.

 â„–3977222[Quote]

If you give me the powers of reality warping, I'll turn every Brap into a Swede and we'll surpass the US within 30 years

 â„–3977226[Quote]

>>3977208
I think white people colonizing Africa was a mistake, considering they introduced them to medical advancements, aid and technology that made them breed like rabbits. Also it's not sustainable, as minorities ruling over unstable niggers will end up falling into chaos.

 â„–3977233[Quote]

>>3977207
>The only problem is that they still haven't diversified
Exactly. They can get money from exorting natural resources, some services (like logistics) and maybe agriculture or cheap clothes but that's it. No Sub-Saharan nation will ever have a functioning factory that produces titanium airplane parts or semiconductors. Their ceiling of development is very low.

 â„–3977238[Quote]

>>3977213
Pretty blackpilling if you think about, because if they end up still being shitholes, the people will eventually move out to better lands to survive.

 â„–3977240[Quote]

File: Screenshot_20260130_191046….jpg 📥︎ (65.77 KB, 1080x1226) ImgOps

File: Screenshot_20260130_191036….jpg 📥︎ (56.75 KB, 1080x419) ImgOps

>>3977190
>>3977207
It's funnt botswana initially got it's kickstart on contract with boers to sell diamonds. 50% of It's economy is selling diamonds the *the* Rhodes company

 â„–3977243[Quote]

>>3977238
I can't be blackpilled by such because it was an inevitability. It's just how the world is, the sooner it's realized, the better

 â„–3977244[Quote]

>>3977240
funny*

 â„–3977246[Quote]

>>3977155 (OP)
the elite want to ensure no development is attained by anyone. they want to basically freeze the world order because they are already on top. they can do this mostly through globalism which forces nations to agree to international laws less their economies get 'aped. also china isnt any better and just wants to take over this system of control not change it.

 â„–3977247[Quote]

>>3977238
the culture and race survives. the government/society can fall

 â„–3977255[Quote]

>>3977243
There has to be some solutions to this, since them being shitholes is also a burden to the world and that low IQ only goes backwards, instead of forward. We will not reach a space age if these niggers still live like their ancestors from thousands of years ago.

 â„–3977261[Quote]

>>3977255
the solution is total destruction of the status quo and revolution against your government. violence is the only way. the only question is when and how we use said violence and how chaotic or stable it is.

 â„–3977263[Quote]

>>3977240
Isn't this the same company that artificially inflated the price of diamonds to luxurious prices?

 â„–3977276[Quote]

>>3977261
I agree violence is the key, but violence also needs coordination and long term planning, as without those, it will end up in an anarchy that may last for decades until a strongman appears and restarts the cycle.

 â„–3977277[Quote]

>>3977226
Colonization didn't do anything. Africa was still very underpopulated even in the 1940s. Their baby boom only began in the 1950s when the ZOG decided to spawn in six million different NGOs and charities that started giving niggers free food and medicine.

>>3977255
The solution is to sterilize negroes. You don't even have to force them. Just give them $500 if they get sterilized. The majority of Africans would do that.

 â„–3977298[Quote]

>>3977276
the cycle is what i want. the elite want to stop the cycle and to stop the cycle is to stop war and violence which induce progress. without progress humanity can never evolve socially physically or culturally. we NEED war hate and violence. its not a thing to be totally avoided or totally embraced. like anything moderation is key and we need to balance the budget. our governments have grown fat and old in the rays of the sun. they do not know what true revolt is. what a population unified against them is. and i think their will be such revolt in my lifetime. if their isnt then all hope is lost IMO

 â„–3977319[Quote]

File: 20250517_083236.jpg 📥︎ (83.75 KB, 1567x971) ImgOps

File: 20250812_174240.jpg 📥︎ (17.75 KB, 360x381) ImgOps

File: 20250812_174501.jpg 📥︎ (12.75 KB, 360x381) ImgOps

File: 20260823_051752.jpg 📥︎ (78.73 KB, 890x1019) ImgOps

>>3977255
I'm afraid it's too late for such. Who knows though, maybe eugenics(positive - embryo selection) is going to develop fast enough and there is going to be le singularity that you hear talked so much about and finally fix niganinos, doubtful however. I'm under no illusion that the EgalitarianismWorld is ran by non-true believers who are going to technocrarically institute this over the years while also being the ones who created the conditions for such by sending trillions of bucks wort of food and baby formula for such so the world is suffocated by theirs while they live hand-to-mouth. I see no easy solution to this

 â„–3977324[Quote]

>>3977319
i think a world disaster will happen to cull the population and to racially and ethically reset things back to the norm IMO

 â„–3977377[Quote]

>>3977277
>Colonization didn't do anything. Africa was still very underpopulated even in the 1940s.
Then why did Europeans colonize Africa, despite investing more than they got from? Did only corporations and the ruling class benefit from it? Did they think they could really civilize Africa back then?
>The solution is to sterilize negroes. You don't even have to force them. Just give them $500 if they get sterilized. The majority of Africans would do that.
If only those NGOs would give them contraceptions, instead of endless food and medicine. Only Israel funnily enough sterilized Ethiopian women in its country.
>>3977298
>without progress humanity can never evolve socially physically or culturally. we NEED war hate and violence.
We can achieve progress even without wars, especially wars for Israel, where Americans die for nothing, only for Israel to expand its borders and kill anyone there. Does this cause progression? Not really, the only thing we get from this is surveillance technology, which is used to jail you or make your life worse if you criticize a country or someone, this is just authoritanism that would enslave humanity, instead of going forwards. I can say the same thing about the Russo-Ukrainian war, where millions of whites die for nothing and nothing good comes out from it.
>>3977319
>under no illusion that the EgalitarianismWorld is ran by non-true believers who are going to technocrarically institute this over the years while also being the ones who created the conditions for such by sending trillions of bucks wort of food and baby formula for such so the world is suffocated by theirs while they live hand-to-mouth. I see no easy solution to this
Eventually, I think Egalitarianism is unsustainable in the long term, as it only goes backwards, instead of going forwards, and that its secular values are suicidal, as it promotes low birth rates, just so it could bring people that come from traditional countries, which do not assimiliate and change the culture and values of such country. Eventually they may come a boiling point from this and Europeans may either revolt or create an enclave that would reject egalitarianism. I also think that China may also focus on genetic engineering, which could also change the world.

 â„–3977384[Quote]

>>3977377
>>Colonization didn't do anything. Africa was still very underpopulated even in the 1940s.
>Then why did Europeans colonize Africa, despite investing more than they got from?
What I meant is that colonization didn't do much to boost African birth rates. The baby boom started much later.



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki ]