/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

>>3974093 (OP)
Honestly, might be the case.

think about it, if trump knows he is innocent, he can keep releasing little slivers of the epstien files out to the public to keep them entertained while not damaging his own reputation
and if the files do get fully leaked he can just go "see i was always innocent"

meanwhile trump blows up irans leaders and all the comments are "this must be a distraction from the epstien files" half the comments arent even talking about blowing up another world leader, its just "dont care, where are the files"

and if he is guilty hes only going to live like 5 more years at most, even if he gets found out he will be dead anyway so why should he care

>>3974107
All the evidence in the files shown so far displays that Trump wasn't innocent. Plus, you're assuming that he's competent enough to use a politically volatile situation to his benefit. He wasn't even able to do it in his first term with the Zelensky scandal. What makes you think he's able to do it now?

>>3974127
>All the evidence in the files shown so far displays that Trump wasn't innocent.
snopes? i doubt he would release a smoking gun, i dont remember seeing anything that made him guilty
>you're assuming that he's competent enough to use a politically volatile situation
its literally donald trump who is more politcally volitile his strategy was making so many contreversies the media couldnt pin him down

Trump is innocent kike

>>3974136
>i dont remember seeing anything that made him guilty
i never said guilty. you are right that there's no evidence that he did anything wrong, but there's also no evidence that he made any attempt to stop his interactions with epstein completely after information about him came to light.
>its literally donald trump who is more politcally volitile his strategy was making so many contreversies the media couldnt pin him down
that strategy was only partially effective. it turned off just as many people as it did turn on.