â„–3956006[Quote]
they can only reproduce via grooming
â„–3956014[Quote]
You see the nazis had gay propaganda and modern crakka nazis clittycels are very much homosexual too
â„–3956026[Quote]
>>3955992 (OP)Tarrant was completely right in saying that LGBTQ stuff is a completely periphery issue in comparison to the racial demographic replacement issue. Anti-faggotry beneficial as a stepping stone for less acceptable forms of "bigotry" and for boosting the birth rates. If the vast majority of LGBT people weren't overwhelmingly socially liberal then I think it would be acceptable to them into the right's fold as long as they don't do the pride parade stuff and vehemently oppose brownoids
â„–3956037[Quote]
>>3956026This, so much this.
â„–3956046[Quote]
>>3956026I forgot a few words here and there but that's because I was working with maximum efficiency. If you can't mentally fill in what I was trying to say then you're NGMI
â„–3956049[Quote]
>>3956026cuckjak excellence
â„–3956057[Quote]
I can understand a soft critique of it by mentioning secondary effects like HIV rates or whatever but I can't find anything wrong with the act of sodomy itself. Why would two White gay men who wear protection, and economically support someone else's children, be a problem in the fourth Reich?
â„–3956058[Quote]
because their bbc bvll will die
â„–3956061[Quote]
>>3956057because they have to sow their ass back together to hold shit in so they dont poop all day out of their ass
â„–3956131[Quote]
Important thread.
â„–3956316[Quote]
Important thread.