â„–3944744[Quote]
>>3944721>Religion is all about interpretationNo, just Saturn worshiping niggers need to interpreted everything, Allah ximself said Quran is the most easy to understand yet there is more than 500 book to interpreted a single book (the most agreed one didn't even get 5% of Muslims to agree geg)
>a lot of people are extremists and some arent theres isisWhy do you call them "extremists"? you can't say kafirs about them can you?
>and theres Saudi arabia and kazakhstan (also majority muslim countries but have set better laws)Yeah, non-Islamic laws.
>religious extremists are the ones that usually bend the original laws to appeal to their narrativesSo if your God a single and know it all how can you bend it rules?
Have you ever wonder why polyatheist have many Gods but one set of laws of each God while monotheists have one God and 5000000000 sect for the same exact God?
â„–3944781[Quote]
>>3944744Provide the verse where it says its easy to understand
>i will be calling them extremists because I dont know how corrupted they are to think that what they are doing is halal,I dont like to throw the word disbeliver around,Saudi arabia has a lot of laws set around truly known islamic laws
>for extremists (in islam) its digging up weak hadiths to justify their killings and call anyone kuffar,also as previously mentioned,faking hadiths,with christian zionism is taking the verses literally without any context behind it,sure its literal but theres also layers to those verses and christian zionism interprets it to benefit the jews the most
â„–3944786[Quote]
good bait OP
â„–3944788[Quote]
Wrong
â„–3944801[Quote]
>>3944796Though I agree with this, my caveat would be to clarify that evil exists, and deliberately leads people astray more than not, specifically when it comes to religion. (I'm not op)
â„–3944820[Quote]
reddit dot com slash r slash atheism gem
â„–3944830[Quote]
>>3944781What verse?
>i will be calling them extremists because I dont know how corrupted they are to think that what they are doing is halalAll doucmneted.
In Pisslam you are allowed to own children and torture them, ISIS did this.
Slavery is also allowed, and ISIS did this.
Killing, crucifing people like Muhamed did.
If anything ISIS was the only real Islamic country since the Ottoman empire 1889.
â„–3944836[Quote]
>>3944713 (OP)Perchance this is true, but doesn't this argument also work with political ideologies?
>Only one subgroup of communists wants to kill all white peopleBut in the end of the day all communists want to do that.
>Only one group of Ethno-Nationalists are in support of pedophilia.But in the end of the day all Ethno-Nationalists are pedophiles.
>Only one subgroup of Lolberts is pro transgenderism.At the end of the day its all.
â„–3944843[Quote]
>>3944796>The reason why abrahamic religions have one god but a lot of sects is because the core tension of humanity is never being able to unifySo you agree that Monotheism is retarded kike concpet right?
Religion is a spiritual politics, when was the last successful centralized government?
>>3944820I am not a redditor you fucking Nigger.
â„–3944872[Quote]
>>3944836I am waiting saar…
â„–3944876[Quote]
>>3944836That's the thing, groups and ideologies have their own clear laws because it target a certain set of people, Unlike Abrahamic religions which have Vague and imprecise laws.
>Take national socialism for exampleEverything is clear, And Hitler didn't make all of the laws nor he claimed to know it all or said that his laws not to be changed, in the begging the movement started to save Germany and only allowed Germans, in the end they allowed non-germans and even brown Wehrmacht been established by orders from Hitler himself.
In the basic laws of an ideologies (taken as religions are spiritual ideologies) clear set of laws are in the fundamentals.
A national socialist who rape kids isn't a national socialist
â„–3944882[Quote]
>>3944830Where allah said its easy to understand quran
>Senseless violence is absolutely prohibited,to not just wage wars for no reason to not kill people for no reason
>Islam prohibited slaves except those non muslims who attacked islamic states first,and even then made it a virtue to release them
>again,isis faking hadiths being polytheisyic is not islamic,senseless violence sex slaves arent virtues at all
>no but it shows how diffrent we as a humanity are,everyone are fighting because they think what they are doing is righteous and justified,god sent one message but humanity is flawed and so now we are fighting to prove that we know that message better,but what we do know is that religion demands justice fairness and protecting the weak
â„–3944888[Quote]
>>3944876Yeah, but you use Christianity as an umbrella term, catholics also have a very clear set of laws my fren and yet you are equating them to some random shitskin "christian" pajeet pdf cult in India.
â„–3944894[Quote]
>>3944888dude. This isn't good bait. OP just grossly overgeneralized to make you and Kazakh mad.
â„–3944895[Quote]
>>3944888A catholic who rapes children is by doctrine standards is not a catholic. It seems silly, to say that abrahamic religions are not the same to political ideologies, since both are human constructs.
â„–3944897[Quote]
>>3944894I am not arguing for abrahmic religions. I am trying to show, that his argument is illogical that is the difference between me and the kazakh.
â„–3944900[Quote]
>>3944882>Where allah said its easy to understand quran Yousef 4, a Clear Quran
>Senseless violence is absolutely prohibitedKill them where ever you find them, albakra- 191
>Islam prohibited slaves except those non muslims who attacked islamic states firstNo.
The abbasid empire (where the Laws of Fiqah and Sharia been written) allow slavery, Mudslime or non Mudslime alike.
The Caliphs themselves had slaves, Mudslimes slaves, little Mudslimes boys…
â„–3944901[Quote]
>>3944896that's good
>>3944897still reppying the bait, doe
â„–3944905[Quote]
>>3944901I do think he genuinely thinks this. A baiter doesn't put that much effort in his retributtals, see the other thread with th 67 namefag for example.
â„–3944909[Quote]
>>3944888Really? what is the age of consent in Catholicism?
The only reason Christbros aren't like Mudslimes is the fact you changed the religion, your spirit was stronger.
If you ever read a 9 A.D bible you gonna read Quran with Latien letters.
>>3944894I have better things to do than baiting a Kazakh on the bald man with glasses site, and I NEVER EVER baited here.
Not my thing.
â„–3944910[Quote]
>>3944905Colorjaks have been doing this for a long time. besides, the more effort, the more seethe. it's like the supply and demand graph, but for seethe x effort
â„–3944916[Quote]
>>3944909says the Colorjeet. All you guys are known for is bait. what kind of a shit rebuttal is that? You're obviously a baitnigger
â„–3944929[Quote]
>>3944895>since both are human constructsHumans are different, there is no laws where 100% of them agrees on.
My idea is that Monotheism is a Nigger concept hand Polytheism is better.
Allowing sub-humans to have their own God away from the civilization is better than fighting them, that's why Pagans had tranny/fag God and each city had it own God.
Let them fuck each others and die from STDs instead of forcing them to obey your laws.
â„–3944933[Quote]
>>3944909There is an official age of consent:
In 1917, those ages were raised to 16 and 14, respectively, and that has been renumbered but not substantively changed and is still canon law today. Can. 1083 s. 1. Also, the "conference of bishops" (and I'm actually not expert enough to know whether that refers to the USCCB in America) is "free to establish a higher age for the licit celebration of marriage." Can. 1083 s. 2 (
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_P3Y.HTM).
My point is not the spirit of christianity or whether they are right or wrong. I am calling out your bad argument in your original post, where you use over generalization that can also be applied to political ideologies.
I can also ask you, give me an official source that says p` is banned in NS doctrine.
â„–3944937[Quote]
>>3944929>Humans are different, there is no laws where 100% of them agrees on.Then why do you think NS has 100% agreed upon laws?
â„–3944942[Quote]
>>3944916Nigga I've been here before him, I just can't post under my falg and real name as some Nigger reported the feds of my country after falsfalging as me, I can't post in my real name and flag for a few months, leave me alone I literally don't give a shit about the Kazakh nor I ever baited here.
â„–3944952[Quote]
>>3944942After our interaction, I was wondering, why you used Colorjak suddenly and not Sandnigger anymore.