№3938874[Quote]
>>3938865 (OP)>>3938865 (OP)Politics?
№3938875[Quote]
Absolute monarchy is best
№3938879[Quote]
oh and it's a confederation
>>3938875Absolute monarchy sucks ass actually.
№3938883[Quote]
>>3938865 (OP)>constitutionalIt's not a Monarchy at that point
№3938889[Quote]
As long as it has monarchy in the name you're good to go
№3938891[Quote]
>>3938865 (OP)absolute monarchy sucks evanoe its the only effective form of monarchy and anything else is just feudalism
№3938893[Quote]
as long as the grandma feeds the cats
№3938899[Quote]
How is it different from our contemporary parliamentary democracies except for the president being called king?
Anyway, Porter beer or Jameson this evening? Not much doe as I gotta get up early tomorrow
№3938909[Quote]
Monarchy via sortition
№3938913[Quote]
>inb4 sarmatianBull
№3938914[Quote]
>>3938879If it's counterbalanced with fiscal decentralization then no, it's probably the best option
№3938947[Quote]
>>3938891Feudalism's defining characteristic isn't its decentralized structure but rather its nature as a sort of pyramid scheme.
>>3938892Liechtenstein is kinda like it ig.
>>3938899Leaders serve for a lifetime, unless recalled via a citizens' referendum. Think the Doges of the Venetian Republic.
>>3938914How can you expect fiscal decentralization when political power is as centralized as it could possibly be?
№3938987[Quote]
>>3938947Absolute monarchy just means one guy has all the power instead of an elected legislature having all the power which is almost always worse
№3939039[Quote]
lord protector pilled
better than the current system ig
№3939046[Quote]
>>3939002so then why the clitty leakage?
№3939064[Quote]
the constitution should be authoritarian in character and the separated powers shouldn't have equal weight
idk what a bull of rights is but its def something cucked
also universal suffrage is gay only a very select few should vote
elections should take place only once per kings life time
aldoe like 10-10 year elections for other things like parliment sure
the powers shouldn't compete but be subdervient to the nation and its ruler
>>3938879a confederation inplies that one of its constituent members can just leave
medieval goverment was not like this at all
it was municipalist and regionalist and decentralized sure but if a noble tried to betray the nation he was getting kirkd
№3939067[Quote]
what if the leader was chosen through constant battle and only the strongest and smartest would take power and lead our people to victory?
№3939072[Quote]
the only ever confederal states ever were tribes of like vassal states to a bigger one
most monarchies were only localized because they couldn't be centralized
ideologicaly centralist realisticaly regionalist
№3939076[Quote]
>>3939067what if a shit weak leader wins doe?
№3939103[Quote]
>>3939077luck
his soldiers carried xhis faction in the civil war
№3939109[Quote]
>>3939064Brappy.
>medieval goverment was not like this at allOk, I don't support monarchy out of some desire to R E T V R N to the bubonic plague and serfdom.
>>3939067A roided bipoc pedophile could defeat a weak, but brilliant and virtuous White person in such a contest.
№3939141[Quote]
>>3939109you want to return to bridal goverments doe????
№3939146[Quote]
>>3939109a white power rothbardian could defeat a latinx tradcath hitlerite
№3939171[Quote]
>>3939109>Medieval Europe was nothing but grey sky and everyone covered in shitslightly midwit take
№3939173[Quote]
The ethnos of the monarch is that he was chosen by god or he is a descendent of "the gods" (tm). How does it make sense to vote in a king? Do the sons get to become king after the first king dies?