№3922833[Quote]
Franks did it first
№3922838[Quote]
>>3922833They are the original zog lmao
№3922852[Quote]
>>3922848The spencers of Althorp are a norman nobility. 😐
№3922875[Quote]
Because we're the greatest race
№3922903[Quote]
>>3922885They are genetically indistinguishable and you just admitted that SSaxons are peasants lorded over and commanded by jewish normans. Not a good look
№3922914[Quote]
the jutes angles and saxons broght them to power in the first place?
the only ones to fight back were the southern germans, the austrians, the Russians, the Prussians
dutch and anglish did nothing but further their interests
№3922923[Quote]
how come the only spics who defended america from WASP colonization were montanans?
№3922932[Quote]
>>3922924Updoot and reddit gold for this reply
№3922942[Quote]
>>3922927unrelated
all medieval kings did this it was the strat for free money
shake up the rabi and take his coems
№3922952[Quote]
>>3922942>unrelatedyou just said the ingvaeones gave jews power which is wrong, the franks did and Jews served Frankish nobility
№3923004[Quote]
>>3922952the jew served the frank
the anglo served the jew
the anglo, in turn, served the french
№3923016[Quote]
>>3923004They should have kept you banned ur actually such a moron
№3923024[Quote]
I was gonna say tunisians did it first until I realized we were the original saxons 🤣🤣🤣🤣
№3923035[Quote]
>>3923024^^^>>3923016go suck winsdor cock nigga I don't fucking care
Dispensationalism is a anglo-germanic invention
its modern not medieval
№3923039[Quote]
>>3923016tsmt him coming back was the final nail in the coffin for this board, always thinks we wanna hear his braindead shitskin takes every day
№3923061[Quote]
>>3923039Jealous because monarchism won and brazil is whiter than the niggerlands
№3923066[Quote]
>>3923039you faggots would rather have the usual tranny babble than having me here kek
№3923067[Quote]
>>3923061evendoe completely dead and buried ideology only followed by shitskins because they're too brown to be nazis geg
№3923075[Quote]
>>3923066>the usual tranny babblethat's this board 24/7 regardless of whether you are here or not doe
№3923077[Quote]
>>3923067tsmt democracy won
№3923082[Quote]
>>3923069About monarchism right? Because brazil is white
>>3923067It's too jealous…
№3923083[Quote]
>>3923077you're baiting me.
№3923094[Quote]
>>3923082obv
>>3923083nigga we are not the same person
№3923097[Quote]
>>3923083Unironically democracy isn't even that bad, you guys demonize it a lot
№3923104[Quote]
>Although similar views were held by earlier authors such as Pierre Poiret (1646-1719),[6][7]: 65 dispensationalist theology was primarily systematized and promoted by John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) and the Plymouth Brethren in the mid-19th century.[7]: 67 It began its spread in the United States during the late 19th century through the efforts of evangelists such as James Inglis, James Hall Brookes, and Dwight L. Moody, the programs of the Niagara Bible Conference, and the establishment of Bible institutes. With the dawn of the 20th century, C. I. Scofield introduced the Scofield Reference Bible, which crystallized dispensationalism in the United States.
Dispensationalism has become popular within U.S. evangelicalism, Latin American evangelicalism,[8] and in the Faroe Islands, where they form the largest non-Lutheran Christian group in the country.[9] In addition to the Plymouth Brethren, dispensationalism is commonly found in non-denominational Protestant churches such as Bible churches, as well as among Baptist, Pentecostal, and Charismatic groups,[10] with traditional forms of the theology being especially prevalent in churches that uphold Free Grace theology.[11] Protestant denominations that embrace covenant theology, such as the Reformed churches, tend to reject dispensationalism.
№3923114[Quote]
>>3923097stop baiting me.
№3923119[Quote]
democracy is better than monarchy
№3923124[Quote]
democracy is better than The Gaucho
№3923132[Quote]
>>3922831 (OP)oof thats another trvthnova