â„–3909324[Quote]
>>3909315 (OP)do you have autism
â„–3909328[Quote]
All this to get clapped out by a 2000 dollar fpv drone
â„–3909339[Quote]
>>3909328never participated in any wars btw, its literally obvious from its name "object"
â„–3909374[Quote]
.
â„–3909387[Quote]
Object: Nophono
â„–3909402[Quote]
are these even still relevant anymore? tanks were meant to defeat fortified trench positions but it seems like russia hasnt been able to use them effectively in ukraine because their progress is extremely slow
â„–3909444[Quote]
>>3909402this tank was developed after russia lost the first chechen war even doe it was just another unfinished project from the soviet era following the soviet afghan war experience. It was built on a T-72AV chassis and was intended for urban warfare against enemy soldiers hiding behind buildings which in that time russia lacked heavy fire support vehicles to support their troops and armored vehicles. it was armed with two 2A72 autocannons and 12 S-8 rockets with an elevation angle of -8deg to +60deg
â„–3909449[Quote]
>>3909402and it was not meant for drone warfare
â„–3909450[Quote]
whoa its like SCP
â„–3909451[Quote]
>>3909444i guess it would still be effective at patrolling the streets of contested cities like kramatorsk and sloviansk
â„–3909457[Quote]
damn no one gave a fuck
â„–3909461[Quote]
looks cool but its useless as shit because autoguns are very inaccurate, this is early protoype of so called BBC-T terminator
â„–3909478[Quote]
>>3909451No and no. Vehicles of all types will rarely reach the infiltration zone even if they are operating in their own sector because of drones. most tanks are being used for indirect fire essentially serving as artillery. Only "turtle tanks" have a realistic chance of breaking through enemy lines and reaching the infiltration zone to deploy troops although this is rare and depends on specific circumstances such as a shortage of enemy personnel in that area the war is slow because it is mainly fought with infantry, artillery and aerial bombs like fabs.
â„–3909482[Quote]
>>3909478drones have dragged warfare back to the 19th century
â„–3909495[Quote]
Object: Govno manufactured in Pidornyjzawod Kombinat
â„–3909523[Quote]
without the battle tank to break through enemy lines it is basically impossible for infantry to make progress on any modern battlefield without complete air superiority
â„–3909541[Quote]
crazy how the fpv drone basically nullfies the armored vehicle
â„–3909550[Quote]
>>3909541Modern warfare
2000 dollar drone can take out a multi million dollar vehicle and its crew
â„–3909563[Quote]
>>3909550so the question is how will the FPV drone be countered effectively in order to break the stalemate to allow the safe passage of vehicles, with lasers?
â„–3909572[Quote]
>>3909550the only way to counter an FPV drone with a fiber optic cable in a cost effective manner is with a high powered laser
â„–3909589[Quote]
>>3909563So far I don't think there is really a solution
APS systems can be overwhelmed or since drones are so cheap, you can just make them use up all their aps rockets.
And jamming can be bypassed by fiber optic
I guess cope cages are a thing doe
>>3909572We dont have those yet
â„–3909612[Quote]
>>3909589its gotta be lasers, but it will probably be decades before a decent compact system gets put on the battle field, probably the americans will figure it out first
â„–3909617[Quote]
>>3909589it gets into the realm of star wars when you think about how the only way to technically defeat quadcopters is with automated laser cannons