[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: ed57021d7c2ac1097c6edacae8….jpg 📥︎ (99.82 KB, 1200x1200) ImgOps

 3894622[Quote]

Antinatalism is seen as kike propaganda, especially if it's spouted in the west. But how can someone cope with raising a child in this modern hedonistic and fake world that is against you in every way possible? Or better, how can you willingly find a partner to give you children? Sperm donor and raise it alone? What if that's not possible? They say that the sacrifice is worth it and kids are a blessing, but what if your child grows up to be a teen and then a young adult, which are regarded as the hardest years to raise someone like that? How can you guarantee for him to live a stable life if he isn't able to find a job or housing, or if he finds one, how can he expect to live if rent eats a huge percentage of his income? Does he just work to survive until he dies at 70-80 without retiring? What if he doesn't find a partner and have kids, would it all be for nothing? And that's also if you can even afford raising a child until his 20s. Do we all just become skilled farmers?
>shut up, niggers have 10+ kids, we should be like them
lol
>our ancestors had it worse and they managed it well
Medieval peasants worked way less than us and they had the elders and the community help with raising the child. We don't have that in our individualistic and overworked society. The average person works 40 hours a week, while a blue collar works even way more; something like that is definetly not natural and makes you less want to raise kids. Also hunter gatherers had no concept of work and went scavenging/hunting for 6 hours and resting 2 times a day.
What does this board think? Do we have solutions to this?

 3894626[Quote]

Forgot tl;dr for the ADHDGODS
antinatalism: le bad and jooish or there's some truth?

 3894630[Quote]

Antinatalism is bad because the nation requires life to sustain itself, and you require other people to live to sustain yourself, so by not giving birth you actively kill others

 3894633[Quote]

answer is to get on welfare and nut and leave like a nigger

 3894652[Quote]

>>3894630
The nation does require life, yes. But the problem is that we, or rather (((they))) treat life and people as economic units made to work more and recieve nothing in return, just so they could make the GDP growth line in the chart, which benefits (((them))) and other pedo politicians. It doesn't help when the nation works against you by importing infinite immigrants and punishing you for having kids.
>and you require other people to live to sustain yourself
This is true for boomers, who had it way easier, however millenials and Gen Z are more likely to never retire and work until they die.

 3894703[Quote]

Bump.

 3894716[Quote]

>>3894652
But in democratic countries, or countries that implement democracy, the government is a representative of and a servant to the people so that shouldn't be a problem

 3894737[Quote]

>>3894716
In an ideal world that would be the case, however democracies are getting reliant on mass surveillance, censorship, chat control, etc. something that the public was not asked or their votes have been ignored, such was the case for EU's chat control that passed, despite being voted against. Politicians are rarely accoutable for the policies they enact, even if it's suicidal for the nation. Democracies are more of a facade than anything, with lobbying, blackmail, inside pressure being more influential than what's good for the nation.



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki ]