â„–3892299[Quote]
>>3892279all you are going to hell
â„–3892305[Quote]
>>3892279being a good person is the most chuddy thing you can do
i love trannies thats why i belive a-many of em deserve to die
its a mercy killing
â„–3892309[Quote]
>>3892279Christianity allows combat and defensive war. It also allows executions, so -100 respect.
â„–3892311[Quote]
>>3892305>>3892305>i love tranniesKEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK
â„–3892312[Quote]
CHRISTCACAS
â„–3892315[Quote]
>>3892311yeah so they can die, re-read retard
â„–3892323[Quote]
>>3892311i love you, i love niggers kikes and retarded disgenic faggots

if i didn't love them i would be in favor of their victory since they are a self destructive kind
â„–3892328[Quote]
>>3892315>i love you so i will kill youtotally normal behavior
â„–3892330[Quote]
>>3892328Do medical professionals practice euthanasia?
â„–3892335[Quote]
>>3892328if you hate trannies why not just allow them to live their miserable existance
its a way eworst fate than being dead kek
â„–3892336[Quote]
>>3892332want me to make an islam thread about what it teaches?
â„–3892345[Quote]
>>3892344Why keep up, you got btfo'd on two points, you should leave ins hame.
â„–3892352[Quote]
>>3892335>if you hate trannies why not just allow them to live their miserable existancethey already live a miserable existence, but that won't stop them from grooming kids on the 'cord
â„–3892354[Quote]
>>3892346All you have to do is say
>"My bad, defensive wars are honorable, even Christianity historically executed ppl around the world for crimes." â„–3892357[Quote]
>>3892354>Christianity historically executed ppl around the world for crimes.as it should be
â„–3892358[Quote]
>>3892345I find the hoops you people jump through to justify your beliefs within a christian moral framework hilarious
â„–3892364[Quote]
>>3892344a bad example
a tumor would work better
if you deslike the tumor in your arm why not just let it rot your arm instead of cutting it off? or something
>>3892352true
â„–3892367[Quote]
btw who is this portuguese guy
i thoght he first was the azorean without his name but he seems strangely ideologicaly strange
â„–3892371[Quote]
btw i lied i love nobaldi i hate niggas i kill niggas i hate and kill niggas
Jesus still won doe
â„–3892373[Quote]
>>3892369>I have always considered you a low IQ personI started posting 1 day ago
â„–3892374[Quote]
what if hitler had a bbc doe
â„–3892385[Quote]
>>3892383are you from 4cuck
â„–3892390[Quote]
>>3892385Did you start posting yesterday?
â„–3892391[Quote]
>>3892373His statement is still valid
â„–3892400[Quote]
>>3892391saying "always" as if we have been having discussions for years is silly
>>3892396who am I then
â„–3892411[Quote]
>>3892404sure but I am from morocco though
â„–3892415[Quote]
>>3892400It can still apply for 1 day periods
â„–3892420[Quote]
>>3892415arguing semantics at this point blud
â„–3892422[Quote]
>>3892411Then what do you believe in and why, speak much.
â„–3892429[Quote]
>>3892422albino moroccan supremacy with nietzchean characteristics
â„–3892436[Quote]
Sorry Gaucho, but here Catholics are cucks who vote for Communism and Protestants are retards beyond saving
â„–3892437[Quote]
>>3892429>nonsense beginPathetic, I asked you to speak much, you blurted out fail bait, bye.
â„–3892444[Quote]
3892442
you get off to reppies?
â„–3892445[Quote]
>>3892420Yeah the point is to bait you
â„–3892446[Quote]
>>3892299i'm going to the trans non bigot hell right?
â„–3892447[Quote]
>>3892411KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK
>>3892436who cares about electoral politics
â„–3892452[Quote]
>>3892444MAYNEEEEEEEEEHHH WE DOND DO DAD HERE SAAAAR NO ARROW XAAARR!
â„–3892458[Quote]
>>3892444you said bye lil bro just stop replying
>>3892445yeah
>>3892446yeah
â„–3892464[Quote]
>>3892458You don't care about the nonsense you say, why should I not continue?
â„–3892467[Quote]
>>3892464ts gurt 💔🥀
â„–3892469[Quote]
>>3892447It shows the inclination in the average Christian mind, unless you're talking about Christianity in the abstract
â„–3892484[Quote]
>>3892226 (OP)My only opinion about monarchy. Its a dead system. Why so? Because all those that hold royal titles or are part of royal families are all incompetent useless people. Also many of them gave up their royalty for personal wealth. While abandoning the whole kingdom and its people. It was great but it came apart
â„–3892495[Quote]
>>38924841 personal cannot manage layers and levels of subordinates down to the individual citizen. But councils and regional councils and magistrates and judges and priests can.
â„–3892505[Quote]
>>3892495And all of those councils, regional councils, magistrates, judges and priests all need one leader who is there to manage them and lead them.
â„–3892524[Quote]
>>3892469i always talk about the abstract idealistic non existing nigga
do you think when i talk about anything at all im talking about its current degenerated state irl? hell no nigga im a chud not a normie
my world is the one of dream theory and thoght, reality is merely how we enforce these ideals in practice
>>3892484fascist/nationalist/reactionary revolution>give the fascists/nationalists/reactionaries titles and enthrone a noble thats sympathetic to us
not about merely those in the system but the system itself
>>3892505tsmt autocracy won authoritarianism won
â„–3892528[Quote]
>>3892524Reactionaries are scum. They should be all removed.
â„–3892535[Quote]
>>3892523God chooses. The believer is to obey and be obedient.
â„–3892564[Quote]
>>3892558Man belongs to God. He has no right for his own mind. God owns him and he must obey him.
â„–3892565[Quote]
i support monarchism because its the only legitimate national form of goverment
almost all nations are patriarchal authoritarian and paternalistic and were enceptioned as monarchies ever since their tribal times
the only nation that wasnt created as an envidioned monarchy was the usa, but even then the ideas of a noble republic and a lord protector were sirculating
>>3892528quite homosexual of you
considering you hold to the heritage of the finish national far right you're quite deviant in your beliefs since you know they were reactionary
the only reason someone would dislike reactionism is either because they are homosexuals the previous state was of a different religion or if they were morally against the order of the past (related to the previous 2 ones)
â„–3892569[Quote]
>>3892564A man has a mind, and a man chooses, and a man feels if his choices are good or not.
â„–3892570[Quote]
>8 niggas would rather suck hidlers shecklegrabbers bbc than be christian
go back to 4chan you all!
â„–3892584[Quote]
>>3892565Even if they were reactionary. Who says we have to follow on their path? Time for a new path. No more shit about traditionalism or going back to some "golden past". Futurism is the way to go.
â„–3892605[Quote]
>>3892584>futurismholy xitterfaggotkiketrannybrapniggerfaggotpedophileniggerkiketrannyfaggottwitterusertiktokuserretardtrannypedophilefaggotkillyouselkillyouselfkillyouself nigger
why are nu-chuds like this?
â„–3892611[Quote]
>>3892605Futurism means to create a new age. I really don't know where you got this idea. But we cannot stay stuck in the past and still really think that the methods of the past will work in these modern times.
â„–3892618[Quote]
>>3892611futurism is about trans rights sucking bbc taking hrt bringing muslim immigrants being gay but not making it your whole personality burning libraries and sucking bbc
â„–3892639[Quote]
>>3892618Not always, depends on what he means.
>>3892611What is your futurism, speak much.
â„–3892645[Quote]
>Early 20th-century Italian Futurism viewed sexuality through a rebellious, hyper-masculine, and iconoclastic lens, fiercely rejecting traditional bourgeois morality, marriage, and sentimental romanticism. While core figures like Filippo Tommaso Marinetti expressed intense misogyny and viewed conventional femininity as a drag on modern speed and mechanical progress, other avant-garde participants used Futurist ideas to advocate for radical sexual liberation, destigmatize sexual diversity, and dismantle traditional gender frameworks
â„–3892647[Quote]
>Queer Currents: Early Italian avant-gardes briefly opened space for the defense of sexual diversity and alternative bodily expressions as a direct affront to conventional social order, creating an early, localized form of queer anti-conventionalism
â„–3892650[Quote]
>>3892639Want something to read about it?
â„–3892651[Quote]
>During Gabriele D'Annunzio's occupation of the Italian-claimed city of Fiume (now Rijeka, Croatia) from 1919 to 1920, same-sex desire and homosexual relationships were openly tolerated and practiced amidst a broader cultural and sexual counter-revolution. D'Annunzio himself framed this permissive social environment around classical Greek ideals.
â„–3892654[Quote]
>Subversion of Morality: Traditional post-war morality was rejected in favor of hedonism, free love, and radical personal expression.Military Culture: Among the nationalist legionnaires and assault troops (arditi), same-sex relationships surfaced openly.D'Annunzio's View: D'Annunzio actively compared the atmosphere and social freedoms of his experimental state to the traditions of ancient Greece ("as in the time of Pericles").
â„–3892680[Quote]
>vote increased from 8 to 9
nusois…
â„–3892694[Quote]
Rejecting Christiandom makes you implicitly an enlightenment rationalist which makes you implicitly french which makes you implicitly gay
â„–3892731[Quote]
>>3892694holy truthnuke
<even doe the first based sigma aryan far right movement was le fransois â„–3892743[Quote]
>>3892731Interdasting, i have just grown to hate post enlightenment secularism, they're fine other than the ugly language