â„–3886186[Quote]
MAURRASISME
'Maurrassisme' also called Integral Nationalism, refers to the political, societal and intellectual theses developed by Charles Maurras, philosopher and master of thought of the Action Francaise. Charles Maurras contrasts the 'legal country' represented by the Republic and its elites, supported by the four 'confederate states': the Jews, the Protestants, the Freemasons, and the foreigners, the 'Anti-France', with the 'real country', which represents all the French people. Maurras' doctrine is based on the unity of society, a society that must function organically on the model of the Ancien Regime. The Action Francaise thus rejects the French Revolution and its consequences in order to establish a decentralized, traditional, localist and federal monarchy, with political powers concentrated in provincial assemblies with the King as the great national arbiter, while promoting Catholicism as the cement of national unity. On the intellectual level, Maurras emphasizes reason and Classicism and opposes Romanticism.
â„–3886190[Quote]
kaiserredux is a doo doo name
â„–3886192[Quote]
>>3886190its keyed but too heavy and bad optimized
â„–3886213[Quote]
>>3886186 (OP)>MAURRASISMEdoebeit this just falls under the same flaw of all monarchies. that even if you have a good king the next king can just be bad and completely rape the government. also how can you establish a decentalized monarchy? i know monarchies usually have to bend to local customs/laws as that was how kings mostly worked in the middle ages until they didnt with absolutism
â„–3886228[Quote]
>>3886213the ideology fix this with the ideology itself
the regime is made and ideologicized to teach the next rulers
also absolutism wasn't really "absolute" as much as they were centralized
integral nationalism is nationalist, it belives in an authoritarian state, were ideology is inforced, so obviously this far right model would curb the problems of a monarchy with the teaching of the nobility and the creation of a new one
maurrasisme was also highly technocratic in its time, promoving corporatism based on medieval guilds
â„–3886236[Quote]
it was decentralized but not in the same way decentralize goverments work
it was an autocratic centralism, even those who ruled the provinces and regions and duchies were still bound and chained by the crown, unlike republican federalisms and liberal ones
â„–3886256[Quote]
>>3886228ok but you see the problems with this right. the standard to teach the next king could degrade or what to teach them could become weakened over time. and how would you enforce this idealogy? through military force if not agreed too? also corporatism just sounds like we would lead to the same corruption we have now that the guilds would own the government. maybe not if the state is truly made of virtuous people but like i said the standard could fall over time
â„–3886265[Quote]
>>3886228also the problem with autocracies was fixed long before the middle ages with augustus maybe their were older accounts but for alot of the good emperors we consider today they were adopted noblily not simply related by blood
â„–3886276[Quote]
>>3886236i mean i do like systems that enslave men to them like dogs
â„–3887273[Quote]
bumo because i need more data
â„–3887278[Quote]
>>3886256>>3886265>>3886276look man idk what you want
a goverment isn't made to be impenetrable and eternal, shit happends
to have golden ages you must have bad ages, and our plan is to start a golden age