[ home / overboard ] [ spam ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1781826437587r-1.png πŸ“₯︎ (85.46 KB, 554x554) ImgOps

 β„–3611487[Quote]

i saw some people saying "the rape gang inquiry's claim of 250K british White girls getting raped by muslims is too crazy, it's a 6m level joke number" so here's the maths
The Jay Report confirmed 1400 victimized girls in Rotherham in a 16 year period from 1997-2013.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-28939089
Rotterdam had a scobulation of 254,000 in 1997.
Assume 10% were aged 10-20, that means 28000 children of which 14000 are girls.
Ages 10 to 20 has 11 age brackets.
14000 divided by 11 is 1270 girls per age bracket.
1270 multiplied by 16 years is 20320 vulnerable girls over the report period.
1400 victimized girls divided by 20320 vulnerable girls is a 7% victimization rate, or 1 out of 14 victimized vulnerable girls.

England's scobulation in 1997 was 48,664,800.
48,664,800 divided by 10 is 4,866,480 vulnerable children, or 2,433,240 vulnerable girls.
2,433,240 divided by 11 age brackets is 221,204 per age bracket.
221,204 multiplied by 16 years is 3,539,264 vulnerable girls nationally over the report period.
7% of 3,539,264 is 247,748.
The Rupert Lowe report estimate is 250,000.

 β„–3611490[Quote]

this is truly horrible.

 β„–3611497[Quote]

>>3611487 (OP)
I think this is terrible and we all need to do something about it like we need to completely change society and culture so this never happens again

 β„–3611508[Quote]

I don't know if the numbers are that high but the cases are still horrific even if it's less than than 250k

 β„–3611510[Quote]

Nevermind I think i just realized the flaw i found this maths on 4chan
>1270 multiplied by 16 years is 20320 vulnerable girls over the report period.
Why are we assuming the gangs swapped the girls once a year for the 16 years?
Wouldn't it be more like 247,748 divided by 16?

 β„–3611513[Quote]

>>3611497
Worse part is that some rapists were sentenced to like 7 years in jail so now they're free

 β„–3611517[Quote]

>>3611510
its very hard to tally up something with so many considerations

 β„–3611518[Quote]

>>3611513
Some were never sentenced. Idk how many are the muslims here doe.
https://www.gbnews.com/politics/keir-starmer-cps-child-rapists-let-off-warning-note

 β„–3611528[Quote]

>>3611517
Probably less than 250k but there were probably more not in gangs doing this anyway to White English girls
>A convicted Zimbabwean paedophile, known only as RC, has been allowed to remain in the UK after an immigration tribunal judge blocked his deportation to Zimbabwe in February 2025.
>Judge Sarah Pinder ruled that deporting RC would breach Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which prohibits torture and inhuman treatment. The judge accepted arguments that RC, an openly gay man with multiple health conditions including autism and deafness, would face "substantial hostility" from Zimbabwean authorities
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/14/zimbabwean-paedophile-allowed-to-stay-in-uk/

 β„–3611754[Quote]

251k? I don't know how they could keep the vans running the whole time, with aluminum doors too

 β„–3611778[Quote]

>Ages 10 to 20 has 11 age brackets
>age bracket
<rape space
"a range of ages with a particular upper and lower limit, or a group of people whose ages are within this range"
The sentence doesn't make any sense

 β„–3611782[Quote]

Yeah I think the flaw here is that they're assuming they're swapping the girls out too frequently.

 β„–3611865[Quote]

Okay, i'm trying to rephrase this without the age bracket nonsense
>1400 raped girls in Rotherham in a 16 year period.
>Rotherham had a population of 254.000 in 1994 (its like 70k today)
>assuming there were 10% 10-20 year olds in the population (there weren't) that equals about 14000 rapeable girls (evendoe 10 year olds are not really rapeable but perhaps english girls work differently)
>if for some reason the distribution was totally even that would mean 1270 new girls of every age ready to be raped
>If the population stayed constant and birth rates had been stable (they weren't) that would mean every year 1270 new girls would become available for rape
>1270*15+14000=33.050
>that's a 4.236% rape rate
>thats 1 out of every 24
>If we assume this was going on everywhere in england assuming a never changing population of 48,664,800 by the above logic there were 3.893.184 ready to be raped
>at a 4.236% rape rate thats 164.915 girls that would have been raped

 β„–3611875[Quote]

File: JS Paint.png πŸ“₯︎ (6.57 KB, 683x384) ImgOps

Has anyone read the whole report? Where does the 250k figure come from

 β„–3611877[Quote]

File: The Rape Gang Inquiry Repo….pdf πŸ“₯︎ (5.69 MB)




[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ spam ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]