â„–3570407[Quote]
not everyone deserves a nuke but i do.
â„–3570424[Quote]
It has often been maintained, and especially by conservatives, that the development of the horrendous modern weapons of mass murder (nuclear weapons, rockets, germ warfare, etc.) is only a difference of degree rather than kind from the simpler weapons of an earlier era. Of course, one answer to this is that when the degree is the number of human lives, the difference is a very big one. But another answer that the libertarian is particularly equipped to give is that while the bow and arrow and even the rifle can be pinpointed, if the will be there, against actual criminals, modern nuclear weapons cannot. Here is a crucial difference in kind. Of course, the bow and arrow could be used for aggressive purposes, but it could also be pinpointed to use only against aggressors. Nuclear weapons, even "conventional" aerial bombs, cannot be. These weapons are ipso facto engines of indiscriminate mass destruction. (The only exception would be the extremely rare case where a mass of people who were all criminals inhabited a vast geographical area.) We must, therefore, conclude that the use of nuclear or similar weapons, or the threat thereof, is a sin and a crime against humanity for which there can be no justification.
â„–3570445[Quote]
>>3570424Too long cant read…
â„–3570448[Quote]
>>3570424Dumb christcuck
I want real liberties
â„–3570454[Quote]
>>3570424So any libertarian government is just going to be sitting ducks with no standing army and a militia armed with conventional rifles? Can this stand in the modern world?
â„–3570463[Quote]
I like freedom and low taxes btw
>>3570458
â„–3570471[Quote]
>>3570424Why are you so smart
â„–3570476[Quote]
>>3570424What about a bunker complex of bad guys? Can you then use a low-yield nuke?
â„–3570478[Quote]
>>3570360 (OP)how would the government even know you have one?
â„–3570484[Quote]
>>3570476Sounds extremely inefficent
â„–3570489[Quote]
>>3570471Nigga he said nothing of use
Tldr; nukes r mass destruction or some shieeeeet unlike guns so we shouldnt be able to own them!!!
Actual christcuckers coming from a self proclaimed agnostic
â„–3570492[Quote]
>>3570479would never happen
â„–3570505[Quote]
>>3570501AM I LIVING IN IDIOCRACY???
HOW DO YOU FIND DRIVEL PROFOUND!?!?!
â„–3570514[Quote]
>>3570505We're all midwitARYANS here, cry about it smartfag
â„–3570533[Quote]
>>3570522Even doe it made fun of wypipo and said xey was da dumb ones
â„–3570542[Quote]
>>3570509Who cares nibba
Let people own their own nukes
Oh wait its anti bipoc and theyd use it to defend themselves like south africa!!!
Also for an individual to procure a nuke theyd need to have the money and be fairly intelligent and according to ur christcuck methodology all humans are rational beings anyways… besides wouldnt this in turn lead to anti nuclear tech developing?
â„–3570565[Quote]
>>3570563You forgot the giga
â„–3570582[Quote]
>>3570563Whataboutism
Its used as self defense
Besides isnt ur methodology "all humans are rational"? You said everyone shoulf have equal liberty?
â„–3570605[Quote]
>>3570582That isn't whataboutism.
>Besides isnt ur methodology "all humans are rational"?No.
>You said everyone shoulf have equal liberty?Yeah and those liberties don't include instigating global nuclear devastation.
â„–3570615[Quote]
>>3570605I concede
But everyone should stil be allowed to own nukes
â„–3570620[Quote]
>>3570615I agree,but it would be a lot cooler if everyone surrendered their nukes to me and let me bomb gay houses
â„–3570625[Quote]
dont want it, unless i become rich so i can dox whoever makes me clittyleak and bomb them