№3570071[Quote]
Free Healthcare and education
№3570073[Quote]
>>3570058 (OP)Free bbc for everyone
№3570079[Quote]
>>3570058 (OP)Trans rights and free gender affirming care
№3570084[Quote]
>>3570071aint shit free lil bro.
№3570088[Quote]
>>3570058 (OP)killing people
№3570097[Quote]
>>3570072maybe if they actually kicked the savages out afterwards but instead we've got them sitting around on our dime for the rest of our lives
№3570100[Quote]
>>3570058 (OP)Hmm lets see
>protecting marginalized groups>legalizing gay marriage (what if you couldnt love who you loved?)>welfare to protect the impacted>open border immigration to help people escape their country>free education and healthcare>rent control>banning fringe groups like nazis and white supremacistsAnd many many more
№3570101[Quote]
…
№3570105[Quote]
>>3570100sodomy is like the most satanic thing ever
№3570111[Quote]
>>3570084The fuck thats supposed to mean?
№3570112[Quote]
>>3570100All of that is satanic except for gay marriage
№3570117[Quote]
>>3570058 (OP)Banning child labor
№3570118[Quote]
National and State lands
№3570121[Quote]
>>3570105How? As long as both people consent?
№3570123[Quote]
>>3570109who do you think did more damage, since we can have an actual discussion, lincoln or johnson?
№3570125[Quote]
Basic human rights
№3570126[Quote]
>>3570120I couldn't imagine paying to make more money in the future,it just doesnt make any sense to me!
№3570127[Quote]
The Japanese Socialist Party supporting eugenics after WWII
№3570129[Quote]
>>3570120Yes there is?
If theres so much surplus tax revenue some can be put into free lunch
>inb4 where da tax money come fromPeople? Who voluntarily or involuntarily give their money? Its the governments and therefore free money.
№3570160[Quote]
>>3570058 (OP)climate change regulations
№3570169[Quote]
>>3570146Alexander or andrew?
№3570199[Quote]
>>3570185didnt answer my original question but yeah id agree fuck that guy
№3570226[Quote]
>>3570199Lincoln was worse than Johnson.
>he was gonna ship the niggers to Africa or somethingIt was a lie used to appease the White Lily faction of abolitionist Republicans.
№3570244[Quote]
Being a decent human being
№3570262[Quote]
Disowning usurious landlords is not satanic I think
№3570298[Quote]
>>3570121sorry i just saw this. do you not know the story of noah? God flooded the planet literally over people butt fucking each other.
№3570303[Quote]
>>3570298Yea because they harassed the angels who didnt want to fuck! If they had consent none of this woulda happened
№3570331[Quote]
>>3570303yeah the angels came down and said "hey guys god wants you to stop buttfucking hes not ok with that" then the people said "fuck god! we're gunna keep buttfucking!" if thats not satanic idk what is
№3570342[Quote]
>>3570331I never read the bible and was js making shit up as I went to bait people
№3570376[Quote]
>>3570342its not even in the traditional bible of today its a more in depth version but thats basically how it went. old testament God was not playing games with retards he was like hitler and stalin and mao combined together and on steroids when it came to genocide until he had a kid and relaxed a little
№3570418[Quote]
Anyone who advocates for shit likfree healthcare and ending poverty is a fag
№3570435[Quote]
>>3570418no they just dont want to admit that if we got rid of illegal immigrants we could have shit like that with almost no issue
№3570446[Quote]
>>3570435It's not free, your taxes pay for it
№3570467[Quote]
>>3570460They should do this tbh, too many people who don't deserve to live are mooching off the gov
№3570470[Quote]
>>3570446yeah and if we were all just taxpayers it would make sense that we all put money into helping each other. instead its white and asian citizens (here anyway) putting up every black and hispanic citizen in public housing
№3570475[Quote]
>>3570470I agree but that's not what I meant
№3570482[Quote]
>>3570475i think i understand what you meant i just went a bit further
№3570594[Quote]
Pardon my ESL but here's my take. People are assigned real fungible values at birth. How? See, lands in big cities were not as pricey and sought after a century ago. What makes a neighborhood worth living is the people themselves. Landlords benefit not from the tenants but also from the urbanization of their surroundings. People raise their kids, build facilities, bolster amenities and such will amp up the accomodations price. Therefore, by simply existing, you would have a direct correlation in enriching a city's value. However, not all lives are of equal value. 18 million jeets cramming in a slum won't make it a better place than a small European town (that wuz not invaded by gringos, sheeeit). Thus we can conclude that, poopjeets, african-americans and west coast sub-saharan africans are generally have negative value/impact on the neighborhood. By taxing the land itself instead of the treasury one has, you can ensure that they (the landlords) can not undermine peoples' collaborative to gem up their place. This would also solve the dilemma of "What if the rich just move to another country", because they can not take land with them.