â„–3561683[Quote]
shit no lombard cares about
â„–3561685[Quote]
I like to call it "Fuddwaffen"
â„–3561690[Quote]
>>3561683skit evary lombard carees abow
â„–3561698[Quote]
I bet he takes picture of himself drinking whiskey at a barber
â„–3561701[Quote]
>>3561698geeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeg xe probably does
â„–3561702[Quote]
It's gay.
â„–3561705[Quote]
Also the type of person to own prop katanas with skulls printed on the handle mounted above a doorway
â„–3561706[Quote]
>>3561705That's Aryan nusoi
â„–3561714[Quote]
>>3561706We Aryanz is tough and sheeit
â„–3561715[Quote]
>>3561676 (OP)why does every libertarian look like this
cag level: ohio
â„–3561723[Quote]
gay ass faggot shit
â„–3561724[Quote]
He looks like those millennials who buy overpriced coffe and burgers in a local cafe
â„–3561725[Quote]
>>3561685imma be using that term
â„–3561732[Quote]
i don't get why anyone would think this is useful in an actual fight.
â„–3561735[Quote]
>>3561715I think it's some gay ass aesthetic they adopted because it's supposed to represent how they're civilians but are willing to turn to a militia-style life (even doe their militias do literally nothing during country-wide riots geg)
>>3561723Tsmt
â„–3561743[Quote]
>>3561732No one thinks that
â„–3561746[Quote]
>>3561732I think it's more of an aesthetic rather than actual practicality
â„–3561747[Quote]
>>3561724Black Rifle coffee type shit.
â„–3561751[Quote]
>>3561747Don't forget the dude wipes geg
â„–3561755[Quote]
>>3561735they're more about the fight coming to dem, eve&doe they live in woods, and no one cares about them.
â„–3561757[Quote]
>>3561732I dont know why a single amerimutt thinks any gun they own would help them do anything against the government. Against niggers sure but the civil war/militia larp is insane.
â„–3561760[Quote]
>>3561724>>3561747>>3561751geeeeeeeeeeeeeg They're like if you combined the millennial burger joint aesthetic with the stereotypical american "tough guy" aesthetic that gets rightfully clowned on
â„–3561773[Quote]
what arr mout-t and KLMK coded for
â„–3561774[Quote]
>>3561757In all fairness, historically every time people have said "The army's too strong, you guys will never win!" the guys did in fact end up winning
â„–3561776[Quote]
The guy to unironically listen to Ben Shapiro rap
â„–3561779[Quote]
>>3561776Tom Macdonald superfan
â„–3561786[Quote]
Unnecessary equipments, you will die if u got hit by bullet anyway
â„–3561788[Quote]
>>3561774Are you going to name Vietnam and Aghanistan where the ZOG world police got bored and left? Do you think they would leave actual american territory like they did some shithole half way across the world
â„–3561793[Quote]
You'll die in that hill then
â„–3561797[Quote]
>>3561757>>3561774Well to be fair it would be a fought very dirty with very inhumane tactics
â„–3561798[Quote]
>>3561795Fuck off nigger i am not him
â„–3561812[Quote]
>>3561805What do you mean by camouflage? does dirt or green colored clothing count?
â„–3561815[Quote]
>>3561806>Andrew TateEven though they don't listen to Andrew Tate because he's sexist
â„–3561819[Quote]
>>3561805they can be useful, solid colors are cooler doe
â„–3561822[Quote]
I just use a grey hoodie it goes okay with black gear
â„–3561831[Quote]
>>3561788French Revolution
Revolutionary War
Yugoslav Wars
Haitian Revolution
Cuban Revolution
Mexican Revolution
The British Invasion of Afghanistan
The Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan
and, of course,
The Vietnam War
The US Invasion of Afghanistan
just to name a few
â„–3561832[Quote]
>>3561797It wont protect you against thermals which are now ubiqutous so yeah
â„–3561838[Quote]
>>3561676 (OP)Reminds me of that one nigga who wrote a fanfiction of all the people he wanted revenge on before he killed them. He called himself a sigma btw.
â„–3561845[Quote]
>>3561806geg this is exactly how I Imagine the guy in picrel
â„–3561847[Quote]
>>3561832Direct confrontation is an obvious death sentence. I said dirty tactics
â„–3561855[Quote]
>>3561847Use your fist and blade nigger don't be a coward
â„–3561860[Quote]
>>3561847There are no dirty tactics doe because all is fair in rape and war
â„–3561871[Quote]
>>3561676 (OP)i don't get why they wear such's stupid fucking camo, like multicam, or any modern us camo, is fucking lame. put on something cool
â„–3561875[Quote]
>>3561860I'm not going to say what the tactics are because i actually live in america but you can probably figure it out
>>3561871Good for pretending to be an enemy (very illegal in war don't do!)
â„–3561876[Quote]
>>3561860keeeeeeeeeek how does rape give any advantage
â„–3561883[Quote]
>>3561876It improves morale o algo
â„–3561884[Quote]
>>3561875I don't know what you're implying
>>3561882Geg this
â„–3561894[Quote]
>>3561874the spotter has to tell infantry where you are and aiming at a camo pattern is more difficult than a bright color
>>3561884Going after non military targets for maximum chaos
â„–3561898[Quote]
>>3561876Because it gives a psychological advantage I thought a
(((freemason))) would know this
â„–3561901[Quote]
>>3561875i don't believe its possible in modern day to pretend to be the enemy. that seems impossible
â„–3561903[Quote]
>>3561831>French RevolutionYou wont get the same portion of the population on your side as they had.
>Revolutionary WarSupporting an army half way across the world is difficult now, it was 1000 times more difficult in the 1760s
>Yugoslav WarsThe Serbs inherited most of the Yugoslav People's Army materiel, officers and organisational structure. They only didn't win everything because of NATO world policing, but they did defend their regions of Bosnia and are now semi-independent.
>Haitian RevolutionSupporting troops before steam engines, very difficult. Plus 90% of haiti population was enslaved niggers who supported the rebelluon.
>Cuban RevolutionMaybe a valid example.
>Mexican RevolutionSame as French Revolution.
>The British Invasion of AfghanistanSupporting troops half way across the world difficult, and Afghanistan is worthless.
>The Soviet Invasion of AfghanistanAfghanistan is not worth losing that many soldiers, plus economic crisis.
>and, of course,>The Vietnam WarHalf way across the world, and Vietnam is not worth losing that many soldiers.
>The US Invasion of AfghanistanAfghanistan is not worth losing that many soldiers.
>just to name a fewYou named 1 (one) good example.
â„–3561914[Quote]
>>3561894Eh it depends, a lot of civilians go out of their way to help the opposing forces you're fighting
â„–3561917[Quote]
>>3561901the moment two soldiers come across eachother do you think they have time to call in to ask if a friendly is near?
â„–3561925[Quote]
>>3561917well now that i think about it
â„–3561931[Quote]
>>3561914And that's why they would end up being part of casualties and things would get chaotic real quick esp if it's a civil conflict where it's 50/50 support and the other oppose
â„–3561940[Quote]
my friend goes to the range in just flannel
implications?
â„–3561946[Quote]
>>3561940do they also have a multicam chestrig
â„–3561948[Quote]
>>3561940Shut him down already
â„–3561950[Quote]
>>3561903It took the Serbs like 3 months to take out the HV postions at Vukovar despite outnumbering them 30-1 and dropping .8million artillery shells on a small village on a flat floodplain, they were not going to win either way. Mind you they lost in like 4 days to the Slovenian police before that
â„–3561952[Quote]
>>3561946nope he doesn't own any chestrigs
â„–3561953[Quote]
>>3561940Kill him before it spreads to you
â„–3561963[Quote]
>>3561903I forgot to mention the large increase in disparity of power between armed civillians and the government that has been happening for the last 200 years. Before, civillians had access to rifles and pistols the same as the government, while the government had cannons. Now, amerimutss have AR-15s that cannot even pierce the armor of 1 lone ZOGbot, while the government has tanks, jets, autonomous AI drones, missiles etc. Also, most civillians will not be able to manufacture explosives required to defeat armored vehiclss.
â„–3561972[Quote]
>>3561963In a civil conflict with no arms like in the UK you either hope the military joins you or a country who is sympathetic smuggles them
â„–3561983[Quote]
>>3561963Wikingtog also vastly underestimates how propagandised, hedonistic, and unfit for war the average goy is. They will abolutely believe the government when it calls the rebels eviil racist terrorists.
â„–3562000[Quote]
Guns and tactical gear are all gay and retarded
â„–3562003[Quote]
>>3561963>But the heckin thermals and the planes!!!!You need an extremely large industry to power and fuel all of that. If even a small portion of the population suddenly started hitting power stations, fuel depots, supply routes, etc. It would level the playing field much more evenly
>>3561983Historically speaking almost NOBODY was ready for war. The average soldier has always been an average civilian who was pulled from the streets. The fact is most people are cattle and they follow whichever authority controls them at that particular moment in time. Even if their town swaps hands 20 times in a single day they'll also "swap sides" 20 times along with it. Literally EVERY struggled seemed hopeless until a small group of fanatics jumped to it. If you're not the type of person to fight don't assume everybody else is also unwilling. And the fact is when given the proposal of "join our army or be arrested/killed" most normies will simply concede with the authority that is proposing it, even if they're 'unfit' or 'not ready' for it.
â„–3562009[Quote]
>>3562003>every struggledESLDEITIES i….
every struggle*
â„–3562017[Quote]
>>3562003And i'm not saying such a thing would be easy. Not even in the most ideal scenario would it be even remotely easy. But it's also not impossible like you say. If you hate the situation and are certain it will not get better, wouldn't you at least want to try?
â„–3562086[Quote]
>>3562003Forcing people into the military like Jewlensky is one thing but who is dumb enough to attack heavily guarded infrastructure (guarded by drones undoubtedly, they don't have enough people and the technology is already here it will be implemented in such a scenario) behind enemy lines with no reward for doing it or punishment if they dont? Who would be dedicated and radical enough for that? And if you think terror can be used to force people into doing what you want, why do you think the government is incapable of that? They will just kill everyone even associated with rebels.
The scenario you present is in my opinion comparable to Palestine and Israel.
Palestine -> whatever state/city supports rebels (gets bombed to shit, invaded, invaders lose some small amount of soldiers and pull back, continue the bombing)
Muzzies in Israel -> people in government controlled regions who may be sympathetic but have too much to lose if they act (they might do an odd terror attack somewhere with no impact)
Israelis -> supporters of the government
Except i cant see any citizen of the first world being as dedicated, radical and brave as a palestinian muzzie. They have too much to lose, are already propagandised into supporting the government, probably dont believe a rebellion could win, and dont believe they will get 72 virgins in heaven or whatever.
â„–3562104[Quote]
>>3562017Vooooting wont get anyone anywhere but i dont like larping and fantasizing that could influence someone to do something retarded that hurts us much more than it helps.
â„–3562162[Quote]
>>3561831I'm surprised you didnt mention the Russian civil war which would be comparable in scale. Basically, imagine the Russian civil war but the white army has military technology from WW2 and everything required to sustain it. This is about the growing imbalance of power between the government and armed civillians, in the actual russian civil war the sides were pretty much evenly equipped. It would not be like that in America today.
>but just blow up the heckin fuel depotsYou cant blow all of them up because you dont have infinite people who would try to blow them up. Its certainly a suicide mission because they would be hunted down afterwards.
â„–3562167[Quote]
>>3562086The Palestine conflict is a race war and so both sides despise each other with undying animosity. If the US government were to flatten entire cities over suspected rebels they'd get way more pushback for it.
>Well actually that won't happen because of le propagandaYes it will. We aren't living in literal 1984 just yet. Palantir for example hasn't even reached half of their goals for the long-term.
It's not about being "dumb enough" to do it, it's about being motivated enough to do it. If America were to truly come to a point where a rebellion happens and people were conscripted, they'll have nothing left to lose. Their only motivation will be seeking to win so that maybe they could experience a better future, because they know the only other alternative is death. Even the most mindraped normie can be pushed over the edge and into such a state if they become even just a little bit too uncomfortable for their liking.
>>3562104Nobaldi mentioned voting, everybody knows it's a giant fraud meant to give the illusion of having power.
>but i dont like larping and fantasizing that could influence someone to do something retarded that hurts us much more than it helps.I wouldn't call it "Larping", That'd be stuff like morons in atomwaffen going and throwing a pipebomb at a water treatment plant or some bullshit. It's really more of just a discussion of hypotheticals. That being said, there is absolutely nothing that hurts a struggle/ideal more than people who don't do anything.
If you really think things are going to get to such a point that you'll be evaporated just for even thinking differently, what would you have to lose in such a scenario? Your life? If things get that bad, they'll kill you or imprison you for everything you posted on this site because it's against the mainstream narrative. The way I see it is if it's only going to get worse to such a point that'll you get imprisoned/murdered just for thinking differently, and the state that oppresses you is infinitely stronger, then you're going to die regardless. At least if you try there's some sort of a chance, even if it's a millionth of a percentile it's still better than flat zero. Unless you've lost the will to live entirely, then I guess giving up would be all you feel like doing.
â„–3562174[Quote]
>>3562162Even if they werent hunted down the government could find their family and execute them on livestream/TV. The goyim wouldnt have a problem because the rebels are evil satanist fascist nazi communist racist terrorists so they deserve it.
â„–3562187[Quote]
>>3562171More people would sign up for war than attempt terroristic suicide missions.
â„–3562213[Quote]
>>3562167The government can promise them a subhuman life of a slave with occasional hedonism and carnal pleasures as a treat, if they dont resist. You can promise them almost certain brutal death for a greater cause than themselves. What do you think the retarded conditioned propagandised goy slave picks?
â„–3562217[Quote]
>>3562187Don' tell them then
â„–3562223[Quote]
>>3562167Lol, he looks so weird owo
â„–3562244[Quote]
>>3562213A lot more people would choose against it than I think you realize. As I said before, ZOG doesn't have nearly as much control as it has planned. And even if they did, the alternative is death regardless because they'll kill you for everything you posted before.
And also, you say these things because you claim to have the wellbeing of likeminded people in mind. So what would you do if you know it's only going to get worse? >that hurts us much more than it helps
â„–3562247[Quote]
>>3562244FailquoteDEITIES won
â„–3562250[Quote]
>>3562244Most people havent posted or even thought things that Palantir would kill them for.
â„–3562255[Quote]
>>3562250People thought the same thing in the UK when they looked at moderately right-leaning twitter posts albeit.
â„–3562314[Quote]
>>3562213If a rebellion wouldn't work or is impossible would you suggest instead?
â„–3562319[Quote]
>>3562247how about… no
Iceland won
â„–3562324[Quote]
>>3562314If a rebellion doesnt work you werent rebelling hard enough