â„–3542327[Quote]
OG monarchism. Absolute louis xiv type beat with racial aristocrat caste in his court
â„–3542328[Quote]
Because democrats offered faux liberty ie lgbt rights while supressing the tea party via irs so chuds switched to authority systems like fascism or natsocism
>inb4 monarchy authority
Im usin da hoppe arguement
â„–3542330[Quote]
Pardon my ebonics
â„–3542332[Quote]
>>3542315I'm not, although I'm ok with parts of that like
>meritocratic limited representative governmentI was thinking a mixture of the Venetian Republic's system of leaders elected for life mixed with competing tripartite powers, Swiss-style citizens' referendums, and something resembling the American Bill of Rights.
â„–3542334[Quote]
Like everything in life some things are better mixed,but not race
â„–3542337[Quote]
Anarchism
â„–3542344[Quote]
Labour zionism.
â„–3542349[Quote]
Schwabian NWO is the ideal modern form of government.
â„–3542356[Quote]
>>3542332Is this because you're also concerned with elite incentives and long run second and third order effects?
America's system initially seemed to be modeled after the Great Republic.
â„–3542364[Quote]
>>3542311 (OP)Id say im a classical liberal akin to tocqueville and henry adams
â„–3542393[Quote]
>>3542356>Is this because you're also concerned with elite incentives and long run second and third order effects?Yeah.
>>3542364>America's system initially seemed to be modeled after the Great Republic.Isn't 'the Great Republic' used to refer to the JewSA?
â„–3542402[Quote]
>>3542393I think
Roman republic
â„–3542420[Quote]
>>3542416Yah im referring to the old rp era
â„–3542421[Quote]
dictatorship with me at the helm
â„–3542440[Quote]
>>3542393I meant like an aristocratic sorr of system, modeled off of ancient roman republic, that's what that's called
â„–3542446[Quote]
>>3542438Rp = ron paul
My bad for not being coherent
â„–3542457[Quote]
>>3542440So basically Plato's Republic?
>>3542446Dw about it.
â„–3542462[Quote]
>>3542447Nationalist totalitarian dictatorship,the goverment controls your movement basically
â„–3542463[Quote]
>>3542457Maybe no philosopher kings, Idk if that's full "aristocracy", they still had other jobs
â„–3542479[Quote]
>>3542477I actually say this
â„–3542480[Quote]
>>3542477Do you have any recommened reading on the subject
â„–3542483[Quote]
>>3542477That's a good thing,what if I wasnt the one in the good class,or my mom huh??
â„–3542499[Quote]
>>3542479Nordic as fuck.
>>3542483Sucks to be you idk. I wasn't advocating aristocracy, at least not as it's understood in our era. It used to have a connotation very similar to meritocracy.
>>3542486I've dwelled on the potential necessity of a temporary vanguard. I have the obvious concerns that come with the idea though.
â„–3542504[Quote]
>>3542480Either you're born with it or you're not
â„–3542513[Quote]
>>3542508So you believe in naturaly slavery?
â„–3542529[Quote]
military dictatorship
â„–3542537[Quote]
>>3542532You think everyone is ready for self ownership? And rational in regards to self ownership?
â„–3542548[Quote]
>>3542533Obsessed gringo.
>>3542537After a few years of unlearning globalist nigger Jew nonsense, Whites will be, yeah.
â„–3542554[Quote]
>>3542542What caused this post ww2 world? Other than nazis losing ofc but why did it all go like this?
â„–3542564[Quote]
>>3542548i think youre way too lenient on how retarded whites can get with too much "freedom" geg
â„–3542567[Quote]
>>3542548Have you heard of the Kallikak family?
>Goddard tracked the descendants of Martin Kallikak, an American Revolutionary War soldier. Martin had a child with a "feeble-minded" barmaid, and later married a respectable Quaker woman. Goddard claimed this split produced two very different family lines.So it isnt exclusive to non whites, and should non whites be enslaved?
â„–3542575[Quote]
>>3542572So everyones liberty is equal?
â„–3542578[Quote]
I'd be all in for the most strict authoritarianism if there was some sort of way to make sure the leaders aren't self-serving.
â„–3542585[Quote]
>>3542581Thats fair but its in a survival of the fittest type right? No civil rights so right to discriminate?
â„–3542591[Quote]
>>3542590What do you say for the egalitarian libertarians? Why is their thinking incorrect?
â„–3542633[Quote]
>>3542599Why do you even belive in natural rights? There is no such thing as self-ownership. Do you justify this though argumentation ethics?