â„–3446204[Quote]
Its way too christpilled…
â„–3446219[Quote]
Sixth Crusade was a Christian victory though
You could argue the Fourth Crusade was a Christian victory if you think only Catholics are Christian
â„–3446221[Quote]
I really despise crusader fetishism since well all crusades were major logistical/military failures (who knew transporting supplies from london to bumfuck nowhere in the levant would take upwards of years in a time where horses were your best mode for transportation)
â„–3446227[Quote]
>>3446219and immediately right after the muslims took back jerusalem geg
â„–3446229[Quote]
>>3446221But antioch was christpilled we need anoda crusade mayne
â„–3446232[Quote]
D- DEVS… FVCKING… VVLT!
â„–3446238[Quote]
why did christians want to conquer jerusalem so much anyway?
â„–3446240[Quote]
>>3446182 (OP)yeah the holy roman empire was so ass
â„–3446243[Quote]
>>3446234ehhhhh even doe the infographic isn't right it still kinda gets the point across that most crusades were muslim victories geg
>>3446238its da fuggen holy land manye
â„–3446248[Quote]
>>3446238Muzzies killed pilgrims
â„–3446252[Quote]
>>3446221Playing devils advocate, these days most crusader fetishists talk about the Reconquista and Northern Crusades. They try to argue until they are blue in the face that the crusades refers to any Christian holy war, not the Crusades(The Levant Crusades).
>>3446227Hey now, they held it for…15 years.
â„–3446253[Quote]
>>3446238And it was also to get over all them precious ressources
â„–3446257[Quote]
>>3446238Because it is based and Christpilled
â„–3446258[Quote]
>>3446238they were obsessed
â„–3446261[Quote]
>>3446243i mean sure but its making it seem as if it was one sided the entire time when in reality it was quite mixed
â„–3446265[Quote]
>>3446261It was mixed yes, but imo it was a negative most of the time for the christians
Mainly due to poor logistics
â„–3446268[Quote]
The crusades were a disaster for the white race. It marked the union of european monarchies and the kikes.
â„–3446271[Quote]
>>3446252the reconquista took like 7 centuries just to conquer all muslim states and another 3 centuries just to kick out all the muslims out of spain (besides, spain inherited a shit ton of cultural and lingusitic things from the arabs) where as the arabs only took the entire pennisula in 7 years
I feel like it was more or less just waiting which side would finally give up
â„–3446288[Quote]
>>3446265it took european armies 3 years just to get to jerusalem
that would be psychologically crushing for any soldier because imagine knowing that you will never see your family ever again because you have to go fight for christ or something and risk the chance of immediately dying the milisecond you land in jerusalem due to muslim sieges
â„–3446324[Quote]
>>3446288The thirst for land and power was way bigger
â„–3446334[Quote]
>>3446324I am too lazy to look it up but was there any cases of crusaders just deciding to give up and desert because they were so psychologically damaged?
â„–3446343[Quote]
If i kept on attacking the same city for 200 years i'd probably give up
â„–3446422[Quote]
I like how anti-Christians will throw Whites under the bus for the sake of being anti-Abrahamic and vice versa
â„–3446621[Quote]
>>3446422To be an abrahamist (juda, christcucka, maphammedian) is to be spiritually brown doe…
Chrikes didn't seem to mind destroying euro pagan cultures, works and sites while preserving Das Judentum
â„–3446643[Quote]
>>3446422chrikes throw the majority of whites under the bus for the sake of being anti-atheist geg tf is your band kid ahh on about now
â„–3446649[Quote]
>>3446621True, most Whites are brown and being White is just a religious and social construct! This is why race doesn't exist apparently!
â„–3446686[Quote]
>>3446621>t.brown>>3446643The ussr was atheist
All the modern states doing the great replacement are secular, more than 90% of atheists vote for the parties that replace whites
Abortion is pushed and supported by atheists
Atheists massacared the most whites in recent history