â„–3443866[Quote]
btw this question is asking for the title of the article.
â„–3443872[Quote]
I take answere 4
â„–3443880[Quote]
My head start hurt when I have to read
â„–3443883[Quote]
>>>3443872 (You)
>incorrect!
Fuck it was 5
â„–3443884[Quote]
>>3443874I'd say 2 or 5, but I'm heavily leaning towards 5
â„–3443885[Quote]
Uhh ching chong chan cheng
â„–3443888[Quote]
>>3443880come on nigga Even Korean students who are ESL can figure this out
â„–3443889[Quote]
>>3443886He's from khazakhstan doe?
â„–3443891[Quote]
>>34438885 right? also not that hard
â„–3443892[Quote]
>>>3443886 (You)
>He's from khazakhstan doe?
Ja vol!
â„–3443894[Quote]
Answer 5
â„–3443895[Quote]
>>34438935 applies aswell doe
â„–3443898[Quote]
>>3443893Makes sense, but I would argue 5 also applies in the given context
â„–3443899[Quote]
>>>3443883 (You)
>>>3443882
>>>3443891
>
>the answer was 2
Polaks lost im going to drink vodka and eat kielbabasa czy cos
â„–3443901[Quote]
2
1 doesn't fit the text at all
3 the text doesn't really explain culturtainment
4 too negative
5 nothing in the text hints to this, o algo.
â„–3443912[Quote]
>>3443898>>3443895you fags are right, It's not exactly wrong but since it's not the main point of the passage it's marked as incorrect. this was the question that generated the most complaints after exam; and Korean English exams often have marge questions like this.
â„–3443914[Quote]
it has to be one or five
â„–3443918[Quote]
>>>>>3443883 (You)
>>>>>3443882
>>>>>3443891
>>>
>>>the answer was 2
>>
>>
>>
>>Polaks lost im going to drink vodka and eat kielbabasa czy cos
Out of vodka unfortunetly
â„–3443995[Quote]
>>3443862 (OP)I pick answer 2, because it has a hook (the question), and has a lukewarm/neutral attitude (like the article itself)