№3436006[Quote]
Nobody can adequately explain how romance works, what it truly is and how to really experience it. We all think we know what it is but we can't explain in words. Some disgusting cunt probably says it's just a chemical reaction or some evolutionary response wired in the brain to make us mate. This person is, as I said, a disgusting fucking cunt who should be beaten until his face is gone and the pavement is painted with red, gooey paste.
I've realised that the reason why some people can't explain love/romance is because most of the population are incapable of experiencing it and thus can never define it, since you can't explain something you've never experienced, or at least you can't be trusted to. And when I say 'most of the population' I mean the entire female sex and men who think romance is experienced with the female sex. Men are the only sex with a true thirst for love, it's wired in their brains to experience and live out. Men crave romance like a drug, except it's healthy for you and your parents won't hate you for loving it. Men crave it so much that when we are deprived of it throughout our lives we turn manic, we want to go out and shoot dead the nearest living human as a coping mechanism for being robbed of a true romance with another living human being.
However, the biggest mistake that us men have made in our quest for romance is our choice of companion: Women.
Men love women, we love their bodies, their skin, their eyes, their figure. Back in the day we went to war and the only thing that kept us sane was the memory of the fairer sex.
But women don't love men.
Men hold unbridled, unconditioned love for the opposite sex, we can love them but they can't do the same for us. And sure, maybe there is one example of a woman unconditionally loving a man but they are rarer than hen's teeth. They 'love' us out of necessity, they can use us, not love us. They're always stipulations with men and women, things you have to adhere to before you even get a chance to act out true romance with her. What you like is the opposite of what she likes. There is no connection, no man and woman can ever be the mirror image of each other in terms of personality and nature.
This is where the true answer to the question 'What is romance?' lies.
The only true love than can be experienced is between a man and another man.
A gay relationship is pure love.
There are no conditions, no roadblocks, no difficulties.
There is only comradery, ecstasy, bonding, love. Everything you like, he likes. There is no intolerance, no awkwardness, no jumping through hoops. Only romance.
This is true love and it begs the question: Does a lesbian relationship function the same way?
No, women are incapable of romance and acting it out with another women is akin trying to cure lung cancer with nicotine or putting out a fire with gasoline. Women rely on men, and relying on a women is useless, so lesbians go nowhere.
Homosexuality is the Shangri-La of romance/love. It is the purest and only form of it. Women also know this, which is why they consume gay Japanese romance novels and live vicariously through this medium because deep down they know they will never experience it, never know the beauty of it and they also kinda feel guilty for having robbed so many men of this wonderful, blissful experience she so envies.
Men can love women, but women can't love men. She needs something from the man before she can 'love' him. The heterosexual relationship is built on mutual agreement, not love. But a homosexual relationship between two men? That is actually based on love and nothing else, a friendship which turned into something more, true connection, brought together like magnets, no strings attached.
So, suffice it to say, men are the only ones who can experience true romance/love, and it is only with other men can he do so.
№3436017[Quote]
>>3436014never seen this Go Compare ad before
№3436061[Quote]
>>3436006 (OP)You can't just become a homosexual ya know
№3436066[Quote]
>>3436061Worse to be a faggot than to die alone
№3436235[Quote]
>>3436006 (OP)hang yourself faggot. no-one wants to hear your HIV spittle
>A gay relationship is pure love. №3436240[Quote]
up
№3436253[Quote]
what is diddy blud on about?!?!?!!?!?!
№3436254[Quote]
i guess bro
№3436257[Quote]
>Erlass des Fuhrers zur Reinhaltung von SS und Polizei
>The Fuhrer
>Fuhrer Headquarters
>November 15, 1941
>In order to keep the SS and the police free of verminous individuals with same-sex inclinations, I hereby order:
>I. For members of the SS and the police, the following penal provision shall replace Paragraphs 175 and 175a of the Reich Penal Code:
>A member of the SS and the police who commits fornication with another man or allows himself to be abused by another man for purpose of fornication shall be punished by death.
>In less serious cases, penal servitude or imprisonment for not less than 6 months may be imposed.
>In the case of a member of the SS or the police who was under twenty-one years of age at the time of the offense, and who had been seduced into committing the offense, the court may refrain from punishment in especially minor cases.
>- Adolf Hitler
hitler would have had you put in a camp, the christian kings of europe would have you broken on the wheel and the pre-christians would have drowned you in a bog. spiritually non-white nigger. fuck off
№3436270[Quote]
also i forgot to sage the thread, please stop posting gay shit, faggot picrel and faggot thread, fuck off, thank you
№3436440[Quote]
TRVKE
№3436441[Quote]
can you post this on broom too please
№3436445[Quote]
>Nobody can adequately explain how romance works, what it truly is and how to really experience it. We all think we know what it is but we can't explain in words. Some disgusting cunt probably says it's just a chemical reaction or some evolutionary response wired in the brain to make us mate. This person is, as I said, a disgusting fucking cunt who should be beaten until his face is gone and the pavement is painted with red, gooey paste.
>
>I've realised that the reason why some people can't explain love/romance is because most of the population are incapable of experiencing it and thus can never define it, since you can't explain something you've never experienced, or at least you can't be trusted to. And when I say 'most of the population' I mean the entire female sex and men who think romance is experienced with the female sex. Men are the only sex with a true thirst for love, it's wired in their brains to experience and live out. Men crave romance like a drug, except it's healthy for you and your parents won't hate you for loving it. Men crave it so much that when we are deprived of it throughout our lives we turn manic, we want to go out and shoot dead the nearest living human as a coping mechanism for being robbed of a true romance with another living human being.
>
>However, the biggest mistake that us men have made in our quest for romance is our choice of companion: Women.
>
>Men love women, we love their bodies, their skin, their eyes, their figure. Back in the day we went to war and the only thing that kept us sane was the memory of the fairer sex.
>
>But women don't love men.
>
>Men hold unbridled, unconditioned love for the opposite sex, we can love them but they can't do the same for us. And sure, maybe there is one example of a woman unconditionally loving a man but they are rarer than hen's teeth. They 'love' us out of necessity, they can use us, not love us. They're always stipulations with men and women, things you have to adhere to before you even get a chance to act out true romance with her. What you like is the opposite of what she likes. There is no connection, no man and woman can ever be the mirror image of each other in terms of personality and nature.
>
>This is where the true answer to the question 'What is romance?' lies.
>
>The only true love than can be experienced is between a man and another man.
>A gay relationship is pure love.
>There are no conditions, no roadblocks, no difficulties.
>There is only comradery, ecstasy, bonding, love. Everything you like, he likes. There is no intolerance, no awkwardness, no jumping through hoops. Only romance.
>
>This is true love and it begs the question: Does a lesbian relationship function the same way?
>No, women are incapable of romance and acting it out with another women is akin trying to cure lung cancer with nicotine or putting out a fire with gasoline. Women rely on men, and relying on a women is useless, so lesbians go nowhere.
>
>Homosexuality is the Shangri-La of romance/love. It is the purest and only form of it. Women also know this, which is why they consume gay Japanese romance novels and live vicariously through this medium because deep down they know they will never experience it, never know the beauty of it and they also kinda feel guilty for having robbed so many men of this wonderful, blissful experience she so envies.
>
>Men can love women, but women can't love men. She needs something from the man before she can 'love' him. The heterosexual relationship is built on mutual agreement, not love. But a homosexual relationship between two men? That is actually based on love and nothing else, a friendship which turned into something more, true connection, brought together like magnets, no strings attached.
>
>So, suffice it to say, men are the only ones who can experience true romance/love, and it is only with other men can he do so.
№3436449[Quote]
>>3436440death by stoning, death by raping, rape and murder, rape and beating. executions.
bring them forth №3436451[Quote]
gated
№3436458[Quote]
^vietnamese yellow groid above me
down
№3436471[Quote]
>>3436462>never posts a timestampyou're literally an indian immigrant to vietnam
№3436474[Quote]
>>3436471If I make a timestamp right now, will you admit that I am white forever and ever
№3436476[Quote]
>>3436474can we compromise on 'honorary' white?
№3436478[Quote]
>>3436477fine. nigger. make the timestamp
№3436480[Quote]
>>3436478tell me what to write
№3436490[Quote]
>>3436487I feel like that symbol means something gay
№3436493[Quote]
>>3436490its an unclosed circle you nigger
№3436496[Quote]
i thought you were onto something but fuck no
№3436497[Quote]
That's a long way to say "I'm a fucking faggot"
№3436501[Quote]
>>3436498post it on broom, nobody uses that dnb of a site
№3436503[Quote]
>>3436501oh, didn't know what u meant
№3436516[Quote]
>>3436505Lighting + blurry to hide brownness lol
You're not fooling anyone chink
№3436519[Quote]
>>3436505Don't you have a bunch of 'cord xisters who can take photos of their hands for you
№3436523[Quote]
>>3436522So its more clear
№3436528[Quote]
>>3436006 (OP)Why are only about 20% of gay men married if their love is so unbinding
№3436531[Quote]
>>3436528that seems a little high, also why do homosexual relationships last for such little time if they were just loving? why are faggots completely hedonistic and hypersexual if they really do have love?
№3436533[Quote]
>>3436523It's because it's only 6 AM right now so there's no sunlight. I could use my room light but it's yellow
№3436549[Quote]
Romance is when I goon to soytan
№3436550[Quote]
>>3436545There little data about this topic but from what is available it is reasonable to inferr that they rarely marry
№3436553[Quote]
i hate my ex girlfriend she ruined my life!!!
№3436555[Quote]
>>3436545>836,000 out of 25,000,000 homosexuals in the US are married>3.34%yeah, i don't think faggots have 'love'
№3436557[Quote]
gated
№3436576[Quote]
>>3436557What does gated mean? Esl if that matter
№3436579[Quote]
>>3436576short for negated, when you bump after someone supersages
№3436584[Quote]
>>3436576>>3436579>hungarianscan you genocide all of the faggots in your country please? they are really annoying and i want to poison the water supply to your entire region. thank you
№3436601[Quote]
>>3436584Leafnigger babble
№3436607[Quote]
>>3436601i want gay niggers on pikes before i poop into your water supply
№3436756[Quote]
up
№3436760[Quote]
Romance is just a chemical reaction or some evolutionary response wired in the brain to make us mate.
№3436779[Quote]
>>3436774Cry about it fagboy
№3436798[Quote]
Bait effortrald
№3437680[Quote]
up