â„–146138[Quote]
There shouldnt be any without reason. Same with sex scenes. If it doesnt serve a purpose, i dont really want to see it. If a character is obviously meant to be a whore, they can dress scantily. But a regular character shouldnt be sexualised for no reason. Then you get the sort of brimstone you see in anime where every other scene is "fan service".
Picrel shows an acceptable amount. Its not making boobs or ass the main point of the picture. The two extremes arent really good, being either having too much "fan service", or being like a modern video game where all the women are ugly masculine characters which boss men around. You can make an attractive character without all of it being sex appeal
â„–146226[Quote]
>>146218I was going to post one of the artsy photos from the 1800s of a nude painting model but janny is too leaky
â„–146247[Quote]
>>146146>you have to leave film to the adults, chud. The people that directed Soy Wars etc>>146138A lot of zoomers and old millenial crones would tell you that's pointless and gratuitous and def fan service. By your own rule, it serves no purpose.
Visual media can transmit a lot of stuff at once and don't have to focus only on reinforcing main themes of the story. This allows peppering extra shit in. I would say making things sexually charged "for no reason", as a kind of sub-layer of a work, would've been alright, but current audience would get 'nam flashbacks from all the cringe they consumed over the decades.
â„–146257[Quote]
>As an AI director
â„–146284[Quote]
>>146257<oh nyo, did somebody say something ernest and optimistic??? EUGH EUGH EUGH GHHHHHHHI will make AI movies and they'll be great.
â„–146286[Quote]
Porn addiction is evil. That is all.