[ home / overboard ] [ spam ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/pol/ - International /Pol/itics & /Bant/er

Politics & countrywars
Catalog
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: christcuck.png πŸ“₯︎ (165.57 KB, 908x720) ImgOps

 β„–3546893[Quote]

>GAWD IZ REEL CAUSE DA FUGGEN BOOK SED SO. PROOF? WUT DAT?

 β„–3546895[Quote]

memes that will make you the coolest fat faggot on r/atheism

 β„–3546896[Quote]

everyone subconsciously knows it but they don't wanna admit it because eternal nothingness is kinda scary

 β„–3546898[Quote]

>>3546895
I mean seriously though. is there any argument that doesn't rely on "because i said so"?

 β„–3546901[Quote]

>>3546898
Why is god not real that also doesnt go down to "cuz I said so"?

 β„–3546906[Quote]

>>3546896

yeah, it's just a coping mechanism because people don't want to accept death.

 β„–3546908[Quote]

Athiests have never refuted Pascal's wager. It's the most simplistic pro-creationism argument you can possibly make, so self-evident in its purpose that a kindergartner can understand, and atheists still can't refute it.

 β„–3546909[Quote]

>>3546906
Atheism isnt a coping mechanism that boils down to "yolo"? So being reckless doesnt matter at all

 β„–3546912[Quote]

>>3546908
>Pascal's Wager is a philosophical argument by Blaise Pascal suggesting that it is a rational bet to believe in God, as the potential benefits of belief (eternal happiness) outweigh the finite losses incurred by living a religious life if God does not exist. Essentially, since we must choose whether to believe or not, Pascal argues that believing in God is the safer option.

that's not a proof of god's existence though.

 β„–3546917[Quote]

jarty iq thread ova 'ere

 β„–3546933[Quote]

>>3546901
>god doesn't exist because there's 0 proof for it
<god exists because…..uh…………………………………………………

 β„–3546937[Quote]

>>3546933
Theres 0 proof God doesnt exist as well nusoi

 β„–3546940[Quote]

OP: Vagina doesn't exist because I've never seen it

 β„–3546941[Quote]

File: 23856749.jpg πŸ“₯︎ (111.55 KB, 1080x1200) ImgOps


 β„–3546943[Quote]

In a court of law the burden of proof always rests on the accuser. You have to prove that God doesn't exist.

 β„–3546946[Quote]

>>3546943
god doesn't exist because bad thing happen and it make me feel bad :(

 β„–3546949[Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png πŸ“₯︎ (1.16 MB, 1200x1200) ImgOps

>In a court of law the burden of proof always rests on the accuser. You have to prove that God doesn't exist.

 β„–3546951[Quote]

>>3546937

>Ecclesiastes 1:4

>"generations come and generations go, but the earth remains forever."
literally untrue. the earth will not remain forever.

 β„–3546954[Quote]

File: IMG_0684.png πŸ“₯︎ (50.88 KB, 620x713) ImgOps

>bruh did this nigga talk like sephiroth lmaooooo look at this nigga using words my ape brain can't understand because I didn't graduate high school n shit

 β„–3546955[Quote]

>>3546951
Well the earth will be here long after me and you are dead, besides im not christian, but Jewish

 β„–3546956[Quote]

>>3546951
You can't prove that the earth won't last forever.

 β„–3546957[Quote]

File: Screenshot (237).png πŸ“₯︎ (24.26 KB, 1033x110) ImgOps

>>GAWD IZ REEL CAUSE DA FUGGEN BOOK SED SO. PROOF? WUT DAT?

 β„–3546959[Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png πŸ“₯︎ (2.49 MB, 1024x1536) ImgOps

>>bruh did this nigga talk like sephiroth lmaooooo look at this nigga using words my ape brain can't understand because I didn't graduate high school n shit

 β„–3546966[Quote]

>>3546959
Stop gooning to trans porn

 β„–3546972[Quote]

>>3546951
The Bible is VERY metaphorical. that verse implies that the world will never end (until the rapture, of course). Earth is a metaphor for the world. I won't fault you too much for reading the verse literally, but that Verse is about how there will always be ground to stand on, so to say

 β„–3546976[Quote]

File: IMG_0779.jpeg πŸ“₯︎ (161.07 KB, 800x998) ImgOps

>God isn't real because the heckin book said so
If you think something like the Bombardier Beetle's defense mechanism can come about purely by random advantageous mutation being passed down over millions of years, you might actually be retarded. There is so much room for error that this defense system cannot simply evolve over time.

 β„–3546987[Quote]

File: Screenshot (239).png πŸ“₯︎ (71.32 KB, 1005x320) ImgOps

atheistniggers….
>

 β„–3547002[Quote]

>>3546972
is everything metaphorical in the bible? you're implying that anything in the bible can be twisted to mean anything? concession after concession.

>Joshua 10:12-13

>In Joshua 10:12-13, Joshua commanded the sun to stand still over Gibeon and the moon over the Valley of Aijalon, and it is said that the sun stood still and the moon stopped until the Israelites had defeated their enemies.


no proof of this+completely impossible with either newton's laws or relativity

what excuse will you find for this?

 β„–3547008[Quote]

>>3546956
you can though. nuclear physics is more tangible than random metaphorical statements in a 2000 year old book

 β„–3547010[Quote]

GEG I stumped this retard when I brought up the bombardier beetle he actually just fucking lost

 β„–3547011[Quote]

>>3546955
forever =/= long time

 β„–3547022[Quote]

>>3547010
>purely by random advantageous mutation being passed down over millions of years
yeah. what's the problem with that? it makes sense. you can observe this phenomenon with fossils


show flag

 β„–3547031[Quote]

let me guess you believe the earth was created 6 thousand years ago?

 β„–3547039[Quote]

>>3547022
The Bombardier Beetle's defense mechanism is simply too advanced and complex to evolve purely by random chance. There's so much room for error.
I am not discounting the theory of evolution, I just don't believe that it and creationism are mutually exclusive.

 β„–3547042[Quote]

This thread is the worse thing to happen to Christianity since christpilling. All chrikes here act like retards

 β„–3547047[Quote]

Pascal's Wager won.
Christ won.

 β„–3547052[Quote]

>>3547002
you really shouldn't have picked that one.
> Joshua commanded the sun to stand still over Gibeon and the moon over the Valley of Aijalon, and it is said that the sun stood still and the moon stopped until the Israelites had defeated their enemies
<
the main reason athiests bring that up, is because it was believed that the world revolved around the earth in the middle ages, due to said Verse. the way you formatted your argument allows me to just say that it was a miracle. the proper rebuttal to the proper argument would sound something like this. the sun stood still, because the earth stood still. again, metaphors. It doesn't actually matter whether it was the sun, or the earth that stood still, the effect would be the same. Joshua commanded the sun to stand still over Gibeon, the sun stood still over Gibeon, for everyone on earth, that is.

 β„–3547057[Quote]

File: Oekaki.png πŸ“₯︎ (12.5 KB, 480x480) ImgOps

>>3547047
>Pascal's Wager is a philosophical argument by Blaise Pascal suggesting that it is a rational bet to believe in God, as the potential benefits of belief (eternal happiness) outweigh the finite losses incurred by living a religious life if God does not exist. Essentially, since we must choose whether to believe or not, Pascal argues that believing in God is the safer option.

that's not a proof of god's existence.

have you ever done mathematics? do you know what "proof" means?


here's a challenge for you. using the shape of this contour in the complex plane, and the function f(z)=e^(iz)/z , and the residue theorem, find the integral of sin(x)/x dx from 0 to infinity

 β„–3547060[Quote]

>>3547047
>guys good is real, because he just is ok
Pascal's wager is so kiked too, like do you think that if there is an omnipresent God xe is just going to let you get all the benefits of the afterlife despite knowing you didn't actually believe and just acted like it was a game of roulette

 β„–3547064[Quote]

Abraham religion's have one true god but diffrent ideas on who he is

 β„–3547065[Quote]

File: Oekaki.png πŸ“₯︎ (12.5 KB, 480x480) ImgOps

>>3547052
so can the bible say anything that actually means anything? is it all metaphors?

let's see

God says
>Joshua commanded the sun to stand still over Gibeon and the moon over the Valley of Aijalon, and it is said that the sun stood still and the moon stopped until the Israelites had defeated their enemies

but actually he meant
>Joshua commanded the sun to stand still over Gibeon and the moon over the Valley of Aijalon, and it is said that the sun (or maybe not) stood still (or maybe not) and the moon stopped (or maybe not) until the Israelites had defeated their enemies

 β„–3547084[Quote]

>>3547057
here's how you do it
parametrize the contour
the contour is an upper semi circle revolving around (0,0) with radius R, from (0,R) to (0,-R)
+
an upper semi circle revolving around (0,0) with radius D, from (0,-D) to (0,D)
+
line from D to R
+
line from -R to -D
=
the residue of the countour
f(z)=e^(iz)/z
there is only one pole (polix reference?), at z=0, as e^(iz) has no pole, and lim(z to 0) f(z) undefined , same with f(0)

the pole is outside the contour

so residue =0
1/?

 β„–3547087[Quote]

File: soy happy.mp4 πŸ“₯︎ (3.21 MB, 576x1024) ImgOps

>>3547057
>have you ever done mathematics? do you know what "proof" means?

>here's a challenge for you. using the shape of this contour in the complex plane, and the function f(z)=e^(iz)/z , and the residue theorem, find the integral of sin(x)/x dx from 0 to infinity

 β„–3547093[Quote]

>>3546966
Projection by a memeflaggot

 β„–3547098[Quote]

next
0=int(G_D) f(z) dz+int(G_R) f(z) dz+int(-R, -D) f(z) dz + int(D,R) f(z) dz

0=int(G_D) f(z) dz+int(G_R) f(z) dz+int(D, R) f(-z) dz + int(D,R) f(z) dz
0=int(G_D) f(z) dz+int(G_R) f(z) dz+int(D, R) (e^(iz)-e^(-iz))/z dz

parametrize the curves
a semi circle of radius T is
z=T e^(iv)
0<=v<=pi


so
G_D:
z=D e^(iv)
pi<=b<=0
(angle going from 1 to -1)
G_R:
z=R e^(iv)
0<=v<=R
(angle going from 1 to -1)

 β„–3547101[Quote]

>>3547064
their name is yalbadaoth btw dont deadname them!!!

 β„–3547104[Quote]

File: Oekaki.png πŸ“₯︎ (14.54 KB, 480x480) ImgOps

>>3547065
Non argument. stop trying to get a cheap own and engage, fuggen r/athiesm migrant. You don't actually engage with the point and just try to pick the argument apart by analyzing it on the most pedantic level. you can't see the deeper meaning of things, so you make an argument, that only works in an echo chamber. the bible isn't a math book, dickhead. It's allowed to have depth, not everything has to be the literal interpretation of the words. My argument states that due to the metaphorical nature of the bible, not everything has to be a cut and dry statement. You didn't engage with my perfectly rational interpretation of the verse, and just whataboutism'd it.

 β„–3547108[Quote]

File: FnYBGjiWYAE6sc6.png πŸ“₯︎ (253.08 KB, 654x469) ImgOps

>>>3547057
>>have you ever done mathematics? do you know what "proof" means?
>
>>here's a challenge for you. using the shape of this contour in the complex plane, and the function f(z)=e^(iz)/z , and the residue theorem, find the integral of sin(x)/x dx from 0 to infinity

 β„–3547118[Quote]

>>3547104
your argument is that the bible can not have any definitive statement, that it's all just metaphors.

so it doesnt mean anything

 β„–3547122[Quote]

File: Oekaki.png πŸ“₯︎ (14.54 KB, 480x480) ImgOps

>>3547118
I never stated that the bible is written exclusively in metaphor, doe? I stated that it HAS metaphor.

 β„–3547128[Quote]

>>3547122
so let me guess theres
"real" parts of the bible that are completely deterministic in terms of interpretation
and more
"metaphorical" ones
and surprisingly there's no way to differentiate them?

 β„–3547136[Quote]

>>3547128
btw how did you find this site, redditor?

 β„–3547141[Quote]

>>3547136
projection

 β„–3547146[Quote]

File: frog trans jsid.mp4 πŸ“₯︎ (4.88 MB, 704x1280) ImgOps

>>3547141
Are gempass users r/atheism migrants?

 β„–3547148[Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png πŸ“₯︎ (42.73 KB, 600x858) ImgOps

>>3547146
reddit won

 β„–3547159[Quote]

My prayers work
Enough proof for me

 β„–3547162[Quote]

File: Oekaki.png πŸ“₯︎ (14.54 KB, 480x480) ImgOps

>>3547128
Non argument. You haven't actually showed my argument is invalid. You just hinted at how my logic may be faulty. What you STILL didn't do is explain how my interpretation of Joshua 10: 12-13 is at all illogical. I interpreted the Verse in a fully logical manner. The sun stood still over Gibeon, from the view of everyone on earth. the logic is really elementary. If something is observed to be, than it may as well be. especially, because the bible IS metaphorical. this is the exact reason why. Do you think that "the earth stood still in space making it appear, as if the sun had stood still over Gibeon" would have made ANY sense, way back when. Not to meantion that it sounds like shit.

 β„–3547164[Quote]

Your shitflinging wont get you anywhere
revert to islam

 β„–3547169[Quote]

File: MUST NOT GIGAQUOTE.PNG πŸ“₯︎ (127.74 KB, 357x618) ImgOps

>Your shitflinging wont get you anywhere
>revert to islam

 β„–3547183[Quote]

>>3546908
Christianity is really limiting in many retarded ways. If its not real, you impose unnecessary and retarded restrictions on your society for no reason geg.

 β„–3547195[Quote]

Most jewish thread of all time

 β„–3547215[Quote]

>>3547162

the earth cannot stand still. it contradicts the laws of newton.
>the sun stood still
the sun cannot. it does not. the earth rotates over the sun, and the sun moves around the milky way along the solar system.


the sun CAN NOT appear as if it looks still.

> If something is observed to be, than it may as well be

same logic troons use+nice esl
so what does the bible say? why does it say the sun stood still when it didn't? it's a metaphor? of what?

>picks apart a bible verse

>it's illogical
<SAAR IT'S A METAPHOR
>picks apart a bible verse
>it's logical
<SEE? GOD EEZ REAL MAyne


okay so what actually happened? bible says "the sun stood still" but it actually didnt? why mention it at all? what's real in the bible?

 β„–3547226[Quote]

> If something is observed to be, than it may as well be
so passing troons are real wompas?

 β„–3547233[Quote]

why would god speak in metaphors? when he doesnt say he does? how are you supposed to know which is which?

 β„–3547237[Quote]

is God fair in letting people go to heaven? as in, before you are born, no matter where you are born, to whomever, you have an equal chance to go to heaven as anyone else (that also isnt born yet)

 β„–3547239[Quote]

>>3547233
Nigga really is having a thological debate with a /pol/cuck
Go ask your priest

 β„–3547312[Quote]

>>3547215
OMG nigga! You argue like an algorithm.
>ok grok, argue with randoms online
<yes bzir!
>make sure to parrot one argument that you picked off of r/atheism. DO NOT engage them beyond said argument
<yes bzir!

Let's not mention how miracles are inhrenetly contradictory the laws of nature. Let's ignore how you ignore how you perceive metaphors to be an impossibility in the bible for no reason(because what's real then?). Let's ignore how me explaining Joshua with metaphors STILL hasn't been debunked yet, as you seemingly do not comprehend what a miracle is. Let's ask ourselves, Why is the bible written in the way that it is? Why doesn't the bible just include all of DA RULEZ and explain the world to an autistic degree? You don't understand why the bible includes metaphor, because you never read the bible. You don't understand why it was written the way it was, because you just migrated from r/atheism. You copy pasted an r/atheism argument about Joshua 10:12-13 and have been running with that flawed logic ever since. The bible isn't an argumentative text. The bible is a Book. Books are written in a certain way. You don't understand the intended societal role of the bible.

 β„–3547316[Quote]

File: 1779478201544e.jpg πŸ“₯︎ (22.55 KB, 346x381) ImgOps

GAWD IZ REEL CAUSE DA FUGGEN BOOK SED SO. PROOF? WUT DAT?

 β„–3547319[Quote]

File: Oekaki.png πŸ“₯︎ (8.32 KB, 480x480) ImgOps

>so passing troons are real wompas?
<implying trannies pass

 β„–3547398[Quote]

dis baited mi

 β„–3547433[Quote]

File: soybooru-234316.png πŸ“₯︎ (948.17 KB, 1024x1024) ImgOps

>VPN



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ spam ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / sude / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]