Chud o3qHTShI 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:05:08 â„– 2397083 [Quote]
Catholicism is the antichrist
!258GEMAV.. wLcRsgeX 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:05:16 â„– 2397084 [Quote]
neat looking church
Agent Nothing 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:07:12 â„– 2397092 [Quote]
>>2397083 Catholicism is a religion. The Antichrist is a person or archetype. Please rephrase your objection in a way that makes sense.
Agent Nothing 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:08:26 â„– 2397101 [Quote]
>>2397090 Maybe he is taking DMSO. Makes you smell like sulfur or garlic. You should try it. Supposedly it can cure mental retardation
Chud o3qHTShI 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:09:19 â„– 2397106 [Quote]
>>2397101 It took you 3 seconds to insult me
Minnesotan Orthodox !!7PVmJUxNNM XrkBkxAu 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:10:57 â„– 2397113 [Quote]
Orthodoxy VVon
Chud o3qHTShI 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:14:57 â„– 2397123 [Quote]
Orthodoxy better because frankly I don't see why you would feel the need to change anything
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:15:16 â„– 2397125 [Quote]
>>2397080 (OP) >>2397113 No it didn't orthodoxy is in error about the filioque
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:16:31 â„– 2397129 [Quote]
>>2397101 It took you 3 seconds to insult the pope and then you cry about being insulted? Don't dish it out if you can't take it. Treat others the way you want to be treated. If you do not want to be insulted, then don't insult others.
Chud kLicXmYW 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:17:00 â„– 2397134 [Quote]
>>2397125 Filoque was added to combat arianism without the agreement of an ecumenical council, therefore a deviation from how things have been done before doe.
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:18:00 â„– 2397135 [Quote]
>>2397116 The Catholic Church does not support lgbt. The fact that some people call themselves Catholic and then preach things that the Church condemns does not disprove Catholicism
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:19:19 â„– 2397139 [Quote]
>>2397134 There was no deviation from what was taught before because it was never taught that the Spirit proceeded from only the Father. It's metaphysically impossible. Historical arguments cannot defeat a metaphysical argument that proves it must be that way
Chud o3qHTShI 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:20:48 â„– 2397144 [Quote]
>>2397129 Did Jesus say to slap people back? No, he said to turn the other cheek. I don't know where you're getting this from but I'm concerned you are incredibly wrong about something important
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:20:54 â„– 2397145 [Quote]
I have yet to meet an orthodox who has any comprehension of what it actually means for the spirit to proceed from only the father vs proceeding from both. They have zero logical or metaphysical understanding of the topic and all they can do is make pathetic historical arguments which still fail to prove their case
Chud o3qHTShI 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:22:08 â„– 2397150 [Quote]
>>2397145 I don't need to rationalize what the exact difference is because I can see the current state of the Catholic church and the gates of hell have very clearly prevailed
mandelbrot !!nGenozfQUg iWwxeXzZ 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:23:46 â„– 2397156 [Quote]
I'm Catholic but I would never put someone down for their faith as long as they worship Jesus as God. And as long as they're not some stupid variation of protestant like "nondenominational."
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:23:57 â„– 2397158 [Quote]
>>2397144 >>2397144 No I'm not. You think you can use Christianity to manipulate Christian's with their own religion. It will never work. If you think it's unchristian to insult someone explain these words of Jesus, " Pharisees
…32Fill up, then, the measure of the sin of your fathers. 33You snakes! You brood of vipers! How will you escape the sentence of hell?" Jesus also calls people sons of the devil and tells them they will die in their sins. But you ignore those verses. Why?
Minnesotan Orthodox !!7PVmJUxNNM XrkBkxAu 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:24:24 â„– 2397160 [Quote]
>>2397145 It's a very complex topic, but what I do know is that even if the Filioque was true, the Pope was in error in the way he went about changing the Creed, and because Papal Infallibility is wrong, Catholicism is wrong.
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:25:37 â„– 2397166 [Quote]
>>2397156 That's you, who cares what you would do? We should be following the examples of the saints, especially the church fathers, and they had no problem putting others down who claimed that Jesus was God yet held other beliefs that were heretical, leading souls to hell
Chud o3qHTShI 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:26:25 â„– 2397171 [Quote]
>>2397158 the difference between you and Jesus is that Jesus is the one who will judge humanity at the end of the world, not you. He can say that because he has a right to, you don't
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:27:47 â„– 2397179 [Quote]
>>2397160 He did not change the creed bc the creed never ever said that the son proceeded from ONLY the Father. That's the part the Orthodox changed. Sure, it says proceeds from the Father but not ONLY the Father. So nothing was changed, just further expanded upon like many other doctrines. I believe He proceeds from both bc it makes logical and metaphysical sense. History is not an argument that can defeat logic
Chud o3qHTShI 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:29:29 â„– 2397186 [Quote]
>>2397179 "Further expanding" on something that isn't mentioned is changing it. And you cannot rationalize the metaphysical, logic should not be applied to the incomphrensible
!258GEMAV.. wLcRsgeX 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:29:35 â„– 2397187 [Quote]
>>2397125 you cant just change the decision of a Ecumenical Council that was divinely inspired by the Holy Spirit.
>>2397129 why is bro replying to himself
Chud o3qHTShI 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:30:04 â„– 2397190 [Quote]
>>2397187 he just replied to the wrong post duh
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:30:07 â„– 2397191 [Quote]
>>2397171 1 Corinthians 6:3-4
King James Version
3 Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?
4 If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church.
Please learn the Bible before further embarrassing yourself
Chud 7WcnMOy! 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:30:41 â„– 2397194 [Quote]
>>2397179 The Creed didn't need to say "only the Father". In Greek theology, "from the Father" already means from Him alone. Adding "and the Son" isn't an expansion but a change, because it introduces a second cause of the Spirit. The Father's unique role as the single source of Son and Spirit is what defines the Trinity's order. The filioque blurs that distinction and shifts unity from the Father's person to an abstract essence, which is why the Orthodox reject it.
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:31:36 â„– 2397200 [Quote]
>>2397187 No ecumenical council was changed. No ecumenical council ever said the Son proceeds ONLY from the Father. If you think I'm wrong provide evidence. Not a link, but a quote and citation. Maybe ai can help you
!258GEMAV.. wLcRsgeX 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:31:49 â„– 2397203 [Quote]
>>2397191 are you a theologian or are you just blindly interpreting scripture to justify your own argument
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:33:35 â„– 2397210 [Quote]
>>2397194 We are Christian not Greek. Latin is also a relevant language and the people who are experts in debating this are aware of the Greek vs Latin language barriers. But it doesn't matter bc our theology is not solely based on the Greek language. Latin is the official language of the church, not greek
Chud o3qHTShI 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:33:50 â„– 2397211 [Quote]
>>2397191 neither of those things contradict what I said
We know that God's judgment against those who do such things is based on truth. So when you, a mere human being, pass judgment on them and yet do the same things, do you think you will escape God's judgment? Or do you show contempt for the riches of his kindness, forbearance and patience, not realizing that God's kindness is intended to lead you to repentance?
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:35:17 â„– 2397218 [Quote]
>>2397203 I am a theologian. I have a degree in theology. I went to ave Maria university, Steubenville and university of Scranton. I am an expert in thomistic metaphysics and systematic theology, which will become more and more apparent as I continue to answer objections. Don't worry I will provide citations to back up my claims.
!258GEMAV.. wLcRsgeX 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:35:28 â„– 2397219 [Quote]
>>2397210 he meant "Greek" as in the Eastern Christian region, not as in the ethnicity
Chud kLicXmYW 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:36:49 â„– 2397226 [Quote]
>>2397210 Sure, but the creed was first formulated in greek, hence the languages significance when discussing it
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:37:11 â„– 2397229 [Quote]
>>2397211 15 The spiritual man judges all things, but he himself is not subject to anyone's judgment. 16"For who has known the mind of the Lord, so as to instruct Him?" But we have the mind of Christ
You realize how cliche ur objection is? The "don't judge" card is overplayed and easily refuted
!258GEMAV.. wLcRsgeX 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:37:40 â„– 2397231 [Quote]
>>2397218 is there proof? i could easily say the same thing and yet that wouldnt be true
mandelbrot !!nGenozfQUg iWwxeXzZ 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:37:44 â„– 2397232 [Quote]
>>2397166 We should decry serious heresy but at the end of the day arguing over whether the Holy Spirit proceeds from Jesus is a ridiculous argument to be having with a fellow believer. I'll defend my Catholic faith until the day I die, but it'd be ridiculous for me to attack someone else on the basis of their own faith. You are likely more qualified than I am for theological debate, so take my statement with a grain of salt.
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:38:55 â„– 2397239 [Quote]
>>2397226 "First formulated" again, u are leaning against a historical argument but if ur claim is true then you should be able to show why your position is more metaphysically and logically sound then the position that the son proceeds from both…we have a common source of faith from the Bible and early church fathers that we can use to draw conclusions
Chud o3qHTShI 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:39:20 â„– 2397240 [Quote]
>>2397229 you are a misguided and prideful man who is currently being used by the enemy into "defending" the "faith"
Satan you're a nigger and a faggot, get behind thee
!258GEMAV.. wLcRsgeX 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:39:58 â„– 2397242 [Quote]
>>2397232 id agree, but at the same time Ecumenism is a serious concern
Chud kLicXmYW 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:40:05 â„– 2397243 [Quote]
>>2397240 C'mon now, ain't no need for this
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:40:26 â„– 2397247 [Quote]
>>>2397218 (You) >is there proof? i could easily say the same thing and yet that wouldnt be true>>2397231
mandelbrot !!nGenozfQUg iWwxeXzZ 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:40:30 â„– 2397248 [Quote]
>>2397242 As in you want to have it or not?
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:41:57 â„– 2397252 [Quote]
>>2397240 Given that you called me a faggot, etc, I think it's safe to say that your accusations of pride are a psychological projection. I suggest focusing less on me and more on Jesus
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:43:07 â„– 2397259 [Quote]
>>2397232 It's not ridiculous if you consider the words of st. Augustine who said there is no graver error than an error concerning the trinity
Chud kLicXmYW 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:43:56 â„– 2397265 [Quote]
>>2397239 I think it has been sufficiently explained here. There's nothing i could add.>>2397239
Chud o3qHTShI 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:44:52 â„– 2397271 [Quote]
>>2397270 MASSIVE YIKES Lord have mercy on us all
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:45:53 â„– 2397276 [Quote]
>>2397257 >>2397265 So then you have no logical reasons to believe ur position is true? Just your interpretation of history? You can't answer any objections to your position other than to claim that your position was the original one? The problem is that we are not arguing about what is original but what is true. You need to show your position is eternally true, independent of history
mandelbrot !!nGenozfQUg iWwxeXzZ 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:46:07 â„– 2397278 [Quote]
>>2397259 I know that, but I think that concerns strictly theologians. It'd be more important to save yourself and others from the greater from greater threats (satanic themes within modern culture for example) before diving back into theological debate. Just my two cents though
Chud o3qHTShI 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:48:07 â„– 2397284 [Quote]
>>2397276 I don't need logical reasons or historical reasons, I just believe that the Orthodoxy is the truth. The Catholic church is very visibly wrong in its current state
!258GEMAV.. wLcRsgeX 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:49:22 â„– 2397286 [Quote]
>>2397276 can you explain more on how believing that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father
and Son makes sense? i want to see your perspective
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:49:59 â„– 2397288 [Quote]
>>2397194 Oh my bad I didn't see the metaphysical claim. It's true that the Father is the single principle (principium) without principle in the Trinity, and this is what gives the divine persons their order. Yet, as Aquinas explains, the Spirit proceeds from the Father through the Son, not as from two sources, but as from one principle in whom the Son shares the Father's power of spirating. "Since the Son receives all that He is from the Father, He also receives from the Father that the Holy Spirit proceeds from Him" (ST I, q.36, a.3).
Thus, the filioque does not blur the Father's role as source, but rather expresses that the Father's communication of His divine essence to the Son includes the communication of the power to spirate. The unity of the Godhead therefore remains in the one essence of the Father, from whom the Son and Spirit have their origin, yet the relations of origin are maintained: the Father as principle without principle, the Son as principle from a principle, and the Spirit as proceeding from both as from one.
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:51:28 â„– 2397293 [Quote]
>>2397286 Because if the son proceeds from the father alone and the same is true for the spirit, then there is no distinguishing between the son and the spirit since the only thing in the trinity that gives distinction is the person's relation to each other
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:52:23 â„– 2397298 [Quote]
>>2397284 Ok no logic, no history, you just take it on blind faith and bc the Catholic Church "looks bad"…haha ok whatever
Chud o3qHTShI 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:52:53 â„– 2397300 [Quote]
>>2397298 sorry I'm just doing what Jesus said to
!258GEMAV.. wLcRsgeX 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:53:37 â„– 2397304 [Quote]
>>2397293 the Son and Holy Spirit are still distinguished however. its two unique persons that proceed from one nature.
< how did you come to the conclusion that the Holy Spirit isnt distinguished without the Filioque?
mandelbrot !!nGenozfQUg iWwxeXzZ 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:54:05 â„– 2397306 [Quote]
>>2397298 I mean he's not wrong. It's possible for the Catholic Church itself to be flawed (because the congregation is human) while Catholicism is still the truth (because it is passed down from the words of Jesus).
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:55:13 â„– 2397309 [Quote]
>>2397300 Jesus didn't say to take things on blind faith. "Always be ready to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you."
- 1 Peter 3:15
Faith must be reasonable and explainable. Peter explicitly tells believers not to believe blindly, but to be prepared with rational grounds for their faith.
"Test everything; hold fast what is good."
- 1 Thessalonians 5:21
-faith should be discerned and tested, not accepted without thought.
That's why we say faith and reason are two wings of the same bird
Chud kLicXmYW 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:56:01 â„– 2397311 [Quote]
>>2397288 So you agree that the Son doesn't take part in the causality of the Spirit?
Chud 73QusfwK 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:58:43 â„– 2397327 [Quote]
>>2397304 "When the Counselor comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify of Me."
- John 15:26
The Spirit proceeds from the Father - that is, from a person. Notice again, Jesus does not say "from the divine nature," but "from the Father."
If the Son or Spirit proceeded from the divine nature, then the divine nature would be divided or multiplied. But the divine essence is utterly simple and indivisible - it cannot "produce" anything. As Aquinas explains:
"The nature is common to all three Persons; hence, if the procession were from the nature, each Person would proceed from Himself, which is impossible."
- ST I, q.27, a.3 ad 3
Therefore, the processions are from persons, not from nature - but what is communicated in those processions is the one, identical divine nature.
Chud kLicXmYW 11/11/25 (Tue) 23:58:45 â„– 2397328 [Quote]
>>2397311 To me, it seems to be more of an issue of semantics and how we understand "proceeds from"
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:00:02 â„– 2397334 [Quote]
>>2397311 I don't know what you mean by the word "causality". Strictly and technically speaking the Son and Holy Spirit are uncaused even though they proceed from the Father even though some early Greek fathers used the word "cause" more loosely…so just explain ur meaning
Chud o3qHTShI 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:00:16 â„– 2397335 [Quote]
>>2397309 Nothing of what Jesus or Peter said there means to use reason in that, I'm making a defense for it right now
Chud kLicXmYW 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:01:33 â„– 2397345 [Quote]
>>2397334 Cause as in personal source, not a temporal sequence of creation
!258GEMAV.. wLcRsgeX 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:03:16 â„– 2397355 [Quote]
>>2397327 i find this to be quite a stretch. the trinity shares a divine essence; that doesnt justify the spirit having to also proceed from the son
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:03:20 â„– 2397358 [Quote]
>>2397335 >>2397335 If u can;t read between the lines, Isaiah 1:18 is more explicit
Chud o3qHTShI 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:05:01 â„– 2397369 [Quote]
>>2397358 >16 Wash you, make you clean; put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes; cease to do evil; ???????
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:05:53 â„– 2397375 [Quote]
>>2397355 No it doesn't justify that's not why I said it, I said it to argue against the error that they proceed from the divine nature. Procession is said in regards to persons and their relations to each other. The persons do not proceed from the divine nature. Do you concede or deny that? If you concede then we can address your new point but let's not talk past each other. It's not a race. This is a rigorous topic, one of the most difficult debates you can have
Chud o3qHTShI 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:06:20 â„– 2397379 [Quote]
Look I'm sorry 73QusfwK but you're making fucking "I'm white on the bottom of my feet" arguments now this literally just has the word reason in it when he's clearly using it in the context of being reasonable when it comes to forgiveness
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:08:41 â„– 2397399 [Quote]
>>2397369 "Come now, let us reason together". God wants us to use our reasoning faculty….He didn't give us logic so that we may ignore it and act on faith alone. "The light of your countenance shines upon thee" is also a reference to being made in God's image whereby it is written to be "renewed in the spirit of our MIND" that's what it means to put on the "new man". It's an ongoing theme-to subject our emotions and passions to reason and our reason to the revealed will of God (faith)
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:10:09 â„– 2397411 [Quote]
>>2397379 Maybe I'm not understanding then what your exact objection is, if we can start over and restate it in another way
Chud o3qHTShI 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:11:17 â„– 2397419 [Quote]
>>2397411 >>2397399 Two hundred and twenty two Chinese people didn't get murdered for Christ so you can sit here and tell me faith is about OWNING PEOPLE WITH FACTS AND LOGIC
Chud I6myuPoW 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:12:32 â„– 2397428 [Quote]
>>2397419 Faith is about OWNING PEOPLE WITH FACTS AND LOGIC. Faith based outside reality is superstition
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:15:16 â„– 2397444 [Quote]
>>2397419 Jesus, on the beginning of the Gospel of John is called the Logos…which is a cognate of the word Logic". And logic takes precedence over your appeal to emotion argument about Chinese Christians dying. Evil people die for their causes too. Dying for a cause is not what makes the cause right.
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:18:16 â„– 2397458 [Quote]
>>2397428 Because faith is beyond reason but it is never contrary to reason. The articles of faith cannot be logically proven from the ground up but since they are true, logic and reason is their friend and logic defends faith against objections, distortions and errors. Were it not so, every individual could have their own idiosyncratic faith - idiot faith, also related to the word heretic…that's why you have thousands of Protestant denominations that cannot agree, bc they abandoned logic in favor of self-glorification disguised as a "personal relationship with Jesus".
Chud o3qHTShI 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:19:20 â„– 2397463 [Quote]
>>2397444 wtf you're actually saying that 222 Chinese martyrs are evil
Chud o3qHTShI 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:20:08 â„– 2397467 [Quote]
I fucking hate catholic doctorine (not you) so much its unreal
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:20:19 â„– 2397470 [Quote]
>>2397463 Quote my exact words and carefully explain how you perverted that meaning out of what I said. Please connect that dots for us. Let's see if your hate can compete with logic and truth
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:20:44 â„– 2397475 [Quote]
>>2397467 That's bc it forbids you from doing what is selfish and evil
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:23:37 â„– 2397493 [Quote]
>>2397463 And let's just be clear, you are claiming if someone dies for a cause, then the cause is good, for example The Jewish Zealots resisted Roman rule with violence, believing they were serving God by destroying Gentiles and collaborators. Many died rather than surrender, such as those at Masada (AD 73).
They died bravely, but their cause - violent revolt against lawful authority and the rejection of Christ's message of peace - was not holy.
Chud o3qHTShI 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:23:48 â„– 2397496 [Quote]
>>2397470 you type like chat gpt and you're running off of pride please unplug your computer NOW
Chud o3qHTShI 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:24:54 â„– 2397504 [Quote]
>>2397493 yeah yeah yeah look fuck arguing with this BULLSHIT arguing is for Pharisees and retards who think like Pharisees, fuck this thread THE CATHOLIC CHURCH CAN KISS MY ASS
THE POPE IS THE ANTICHRIST
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:25:06 â„– 2397506 [Quote]
>>2397496 Hahaha I was waiting for that…if your ego has to cope by claiming,one i, using ChatGPT, I will happily accept a challenge to do a live video debate right now…we can do it on MeetMe and invite everyone here and we will see if I'm needing ChatGPT. BRING IT
Chud o3qHTShI 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:27:39 â„– 2397522 [Quote]
>>2397506 Oh so you WANTED me to get annoyed, real slick there willy that's a really good faith argument like how your faith is based off of a bunch of bullshit reasoning
>>2397506 Sure warrior P we can do meet me or something
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:28:28 â„– 2397526 [Quote]
>>2397504 Wrong again.
"And he entered the synagogue and for three months spoke boldly, reasoning and persuading them about the kingdom of God. But when some became stubborn and continued in unbelief, speaking evil of the Way before the multitude, he departed from them, and took the disciples with him, reasoning daily in the school of Tyrannus."
- Acts 19:8-9, RSV
Paul argued with the Jews and disputed with the greeks
Chud o3qHTShI 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:29:23 â„– 2397532 [Quote]
>>2397526 >BUT- BUT PAUL you ain't Paul nigga
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:30:26 â„– 2397536 [Quote]
>>2397522 Good I hope everyone watches..my name on MeetMe is Faith&Reason what is yours…I'll be waiting let us know when u arrive
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:30:52 â„– 2397537 [Quote]
>>2397532 And you aren't me
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:32:04 â„– 2397542 [Quote]
>>2397522 Yes I love annoying jealous and envious people who get miserable at every gift and talent that they lack but others possess…pure evil and I will enjoy watching ur jealousy turn in on itself for ur false accusations
Chud o3qHTShI 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:32:16 â„– 2397544 [Quote]
>>2397536 Is meet me an app or something?
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:34:58 â„– 2397556 [Quote]
>>2397544 Ya im gonna go live and paste the url in a minute…lets see who shows up can't wait to see what these chat chat accusers will say on live bideo
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:36:59 â„– 2397568 [Quote]
So I'm ready to go live to call the bluff of the hater who said I need ChatGPT…anyone actually gonna show
Eskimos 9UGcF2aj 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:38:10 â„– 2397575 [Quote]
>>2397556 nigga im gonna donate you 30 sheckels
Chud I6myuPoW 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:40:17 â„– 2397580 [Quote]
>>2397496 Non argument. Emotional attack.
Chud 73QusfwK 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:40:35 â„– 2397582 [Quote]
>>2397573 I'm still waiting for my opponent to tell me his name on meetme
Chud I6myuPoW 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:41:03 â„– 2397585 [Quote]
>>2397582 He's too busy drawing furry porn
Chud o3qHTShI 11/12/25 (Wed) 00:41:28 â„– 2397587 [Quote]
>>2397582 It's chud
>>2397585 Hey who told you that?